[jira] [Commented] (XERCESC-2091) DOMNormalizerTest behaves differently w/ VS2010 32-bit and 64-bit builds

2017-04-26 Thread Alex Phillips (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15985938#comment-15985938 ] Alex Phillips commented on XERCESC-2091: I confirmed the Exception occurs on 64-bit builds using

RE: Integrating CMake support for xerces

2017-04-26 Thread Dean Roddey
I would have been writing the original version of the parser in about 98 probably, so C++98 would have only just come into being. Though, the thing with not just sharing allocated memory with the containing application was added later. I didn't write it that way at the start and wouldn't have

Re: Integrating CMake support for xerces

2017-04-26 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 4/26/17, 4:04 AM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: > Agreed that just moving up to C++98 standard types in and of itself > would be greatly beneficial. There should be no portability barrier to > achieving that. No, definitely not. I've been using the STL and Boost for years now

Re: Integrating CMake support for xerces

2017-04-26 Thread Roger Leigh
On 26/04/2017 01:30, Cantor, Scott wrote: On 4/25/17, 3:17 PM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: That said, I'd not be averse to including support for standard C++; using Xerces is often a bugbear due to its age. All our code is now C++11, with RAII wrappers to make Xerces play