Hi
thanks.
In Makefile.incl we removed all occurrences of next line:
-L/usr/local/lib
We have older GCC(default) still there. It has all libstdc++ installed
there and
libstdc++.so -> libstdc++.so.5.0.1
linked to 5.0.1. That what gave trouble.
warm regards
Saurabh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/10/2
DOMElement::setAttributeNS needlessly creates DOMAttr if a qualified name is
used
-
Key: XERCESC-1473
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1473
Project: Xerces-C++
Type: Imp
Maybe this is sort of well-understood by people, but I was rather surprised
to find that every single DOM document I create and hold is reserving 64k
blocks right off the bat due to the size of the kHeapAllocSize constant
inside DOMDocumentImpl.cpp
I couldn't figure out why I was losing so much RA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1400?page=all ]
cargilld resolved XERCESC-1400:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Hi,
I removed the references to DOMSystemException in the 2.7 and 3.0 branches in
svn.
David
> DOMWriter::writeNode throws DOMSystemEx
It works fine with GCC 3.4.3 and 4.0.0. Also, GCC on Solaris is not
supported to begin with. Whoever needed this fixed should probably check the
fixed bug logs for GCC and see if this was addressed. I imagine it must have
been. I seriously doubt this is Xerces' fault.
HTH,
Matt
-Original Mess
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1169?page=all ]
Alberto Massari resolved XERCESC-1169:
--
Fix Version: 2.6.0
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: (was: Xerces-C Developers Mailing List)
It looks getMessage has been added ove
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-974?page=all ]
Alberto Massari resolved XERCESC-974:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: (was: Xerces-C Developers Mailing List)
Base64 data uses whitespace only as a formatting, not to represent
Hey all,
Sorry for the cross post, but I want to get as much input as
possible. We had a PMC phone call a couple of days ago and we decided
it would be good if we went to Apache con and did a talk. We are now
a TLP and should participate as much as possible tin these things. It
will be valua
Hi,
Ram wrote:
Hi Jesse,
Actually I have posted this only after going through
the archives. That discussion was not conclusive.
There has been some related discussion. I summarized it in a blog entry:
http://blog.parthenoncomputing.com/xerces/archives/2005/05/memory_manageme.html
My Questi
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1289?page=all ]
cargilld resolved XERCESC-1289:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Closing, since no response to provide additional information required.
David
> Xerces-c++ version 2.60 crashes.
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1292?page=all ]
cargilld resolved XERCESC-1292:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Closing, since no response to provide additional information required.
David
> multiple occurance of same attributes in Attributes
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-769?page=all ]
Alberto Massari updated XERCESC-769:
Bugzilla Id: (was: 15785)
type: Improvement (was: Bug)
Description:
The Xerces-C++ documentation briefly mentions that Xerces is "mod
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1341?page=all ]
cargilld resolved XERCESC-1341:
---
Resolution: Incomplete
Closing, since no response to provide additional information required.
David
> Gives IOT/Abort (core dump)
> --
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1360?page=comments#action_12318305
]
cargilld commented on XERCESC-1360:
---
Hi,
Is this still a problem or can we close this bug?
BTW, the error sounds like a compiler error, so maybe it is a problem with
g
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1368?page=comments#action_12318304
]
cargilld commented on XERCESC-1368:
---
Hi Dave,
Do you have more patches coming for this bug or should we close it?
Thanks,
David
> Catch-all handler are problematic on W
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1439?page=all ]
Alberto Massari resolved XERCESC-1439:
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of XERCESC-1440
> 3.0-unstable: make output improved (pretty-print)
> --
Hi Jesse,
Actually I have posted this only after going through
the archives. That discussion was not conclusive.
My Question is :
a)If we search for non-existent entries in a file why
the memory is increased using getElementsByTagName() ?
(I may not have the liberty to release the document
everyt
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1468?page=comments#action_12318274
]
Manfred Egger commented on XERCESC-1468:
OK, I see. Solved this Issue with a MemBufFormatTarget
> Wrong encoding in output
>
>
> K
18 matches
Mail list logo