RE: Xerces

2006-02-22 Thread Saurabh Bhatnagar
Hi, You can out in in runconfigre scipt under the CCFLAGS var or pass it to the script in command line using -z(?) option. All the best! Saurabh -Original Message- From: tristan mcmillan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 6:42 PM To: xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org

Saurabh Bhatnagar is out of the office.

2005-10-28 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
I will be Out of the Office Start Date: 9/29/2005. End Date: 11/2/2005. I will respond to your message upon my return. warm regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: WIN64 build on x64 platform using MSVS 2005 Beta

2005-09-02 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
Hi Can anyone expalin the difference b/w the WIN32 native messageloader and INMEM messageloader? warm regards Saurabh Saurabh Bhatnagar/BLR/HTL 08/23/2005 07:38 PM To c-dev@xerces.apache.org cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], c-dev@xerces.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: WIN64 build on x64

Re: WIN64 build on x64 platform using MSVS 2005 Beta

2005-09-02 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
expalin the difference b/w the WIN32 native messageloader and INMEM messageloader? warm regards Saurabh Saurabh Bhatnagar/BLR/HTL 08/23/2005 07:38 PM To c-dev@xerces.apache.org cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], c-dev@xerces.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: WIN64 build on x64 platform using MSVS 2005

Re: WIN64 build on x64 platform using MSVS 2005 Beta

2005-09-02 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
in the data section of the code. Alberto At 14.17 02/09/2005 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Can anyone expalin the difference b/w the WIN32 native messageloader and INMEM messageloader? warm regards Saurabh Saurabh Bhatnagar/BLR/HTL 08/23/2005 07:38 PM To c-dev

WIN64 build on x64 platform using MSVS 2005 Beta

2005-08-23 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
I am getting this fatal error LNK1112 1..\..\..\..\..\build\win64\vc8\release\obj\Base64.obj : fatal error LNK1112: module machine type 'x64' conflicts with target machine type 'X86' My command line in VC++ 8 looks like /O1 /Ob2 /I ..\..\..\..\..\src /D NDEBUG /D PLATFORM_WIN64 /D

Re: WIN64 build on x64 platform using MSVS 2005 Beta

2005-08-23 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
OOPS! Just noticed that in Additoional Linker options we find /MACHINE:I386 warm regards Saurabh Saurabh Bhatnagar/BLR/HTL 08/23/2005 02:14 PM To c-dev@xerces.apache.org cc Akshya Pradhan/BLR/[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: WIN64 build on x64 platform using MSVS 2005 Beta

Re: WIN64 build on x64 platform using MSVS 2005 Beta

2005-08-23 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
..\..\..\..\..\Build\Win64\VC8\Release\xerces-c_2_6.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals Any clues? Where does that symbol exist? I can't find it in the source. warm regards Saurabh Saurabh Bhatnagar/BLR/HTL 08/23/2005 02:14 PM To c-dev@xerces.apache.org cc Akshya Pradhan/BLR/[EMAIL

Re: WIN64 build on x64 platform using MSVS 2005 Beta

2005-08-23 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@xercesc_2_6@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 1..\..\..\..\..\Build\Win64\VC8\Release\xerces-c_2_6.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals Any clues? Where does that symbol exist? I can't find it in the source. warm regards Saurabh Saurabh Bhatnagar/BLR/HTL

RE: [jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1360) compile error for 64bit solaris binary by GCC 3.3.2

2005-08-10 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
Hi thanks. In Makefile.incl we removed all occurrences of next line: -L/usr/local/lib We have older GCC(default) still there. It has all libstdc++ installed there and libstdc++.so - libstdc++.so.5.0.1 linked to 5.0.1. That what gave trouble. warm regards Saurabh [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BUILDING XERCES ON SUN8 ULTRA SERVER, USING GCC3.4.2 (libstdc++.6.0.2)

2005-08-09 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
Hi Well, to simplify the matter. We have sucessfully built Xerces2-6-0 on another machine with different harware but same OS Version. That machine has sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-480R Architecture and the one in question is sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-4. Both have the SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-24.

RE: Xalan 64 bit issues with runConfigure - compile and link flags for the execreation

2005-06-19 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
Point is taken! I faced a mililar problem in Xerces 64 bit and once I was able to resolve that, came to Xalan. warm regards Saurabh Jesse Pelton [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/2005 06:58 PM Please respond to c-dev@xerces.apache.org To c-dev@xerces.apache.org cc Subject RE: Xalan 64 bit issues

RE: Can Xerces be built on Solaris x86 64bit system?

2005-06-16 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
Thanks Matt! It worked for me as wellI had somehow not included -m64 flag!!! Thinking that bitstobuild will take care.. Will try Xalan 64 bot next. warm regards Saurabh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/08/2005 10:16 PM Please respond to c-dev@xerces.apache.org To c-dev@xerces.apache.org cc

Re: Can Xerces be built on Solaris x86 64bit system?

2005-06-07 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
Hi I did try buildign it. 64 bit is not supported on Xerces for GCC but for native compiler you should be able to use the runConfigure and build. warm regards Saurabh Biao Hou [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/07/2005 08:56 PM Please respond to c-dev@xerces.apache.org To xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org

RE: Can Xerces be built on Solaris x86 64bit system?

2005-06-07 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
Hi Matt, It didn't work for me as you suggested. Please reply to my mail on this in archive.! warm regards Saurabh Biao Hou [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/07/2005 10:46 PM Please respond to c-dev@xerces.apache.org To c-dev@xerces.apache.org cc Subject RE: Can Xerces be built on Solaris x86 64bit

RE: Fw: Building Xerces 2.3.0 with GCC 3.4.2 on Solaris5.8!!!

2005-05-26 Thread Saurabh . Bhatnagar
e_phentsize: 32 e_phnum: 3 warm regards Saurabh Saurabh Bhatnagar/BLR/HTL 04/20/2005 05:08 PM To c-dev@xerces.apache.org cc Subject Fw: Building Xerces 2.3.0 with GCC 3.4.2 on Solaris5.8!!! Any takers for my query on the size of 64 vs 32 bit builds? warm regards Saurabh