Re: CI testing of Xerces-C

2020-04-06 Thread Roger Leigh
On 06/04/2020 13:28, Cantor, Scott wrote: On 4/6/20, 8:24 AM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: It should be pretty simple for any Apache contributor to push any potential update as a feature branch to GitBox and then check the CI run passes, prior to merging to an integration branch. This will ensure

Re: CI testing of Xerces-C

2020-04-06 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 4/6/20, 8:24 AM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: > It should be pretty simple for any Apache contributor to push any > potential update as a feature branch to GitBox and then check the CI run > passes, prior to merging to an integration branch. This will ensure > that no regressions should be

Re: CI testing of Xerces-C

2020-04-06 Thread Roger Leigh
On 06/04/2020 12:42, Cantor, Scott wrote: On 4/6/20, 7:21 AM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: You can simply push your feature branch and wait for the tests to pass before merging to and pushing the integration branch. I'm not sure that there's been adequate discussion of any actual development

Re: CI testing of Xerces-C

2020-04-06 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 4/6/20, 7:21 AM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: > You can simply push your feature branch and wait for the tests to pass > before merging to and pushing the integration > branch. I'm not sure that there's been adequate discussion of any actual development process for using git, or any policies put

CI testing of Xerces-C

2020-04-06 Thread Roger Leigh
Dear all, CI testing was present prior to the switch from SVN to GitBox, but needed re-enabling by Infra for the new repository.  It's re-enabled since yesterday (see INFRA-20073), and both the xerces-3.2 and master branch are passing for both Travis and AppVeyor: