Re: Proposal for future development of Xerces-C 4.0.0

2020-06-22 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Roger Leigh writes: > I'm not entirely sure how to class code written using L"". It's not really > portable, being Windows-only as you say (Windows being the only platform > where wchar_t is 16-bit and usable as XMLCh). And it's not strictly portable > even to different builds of Xerces-C, given

Re: Proposal for future development of Xerces-C 4.0.0

2020-06-19 Thread Roger Leigh
On 19/06/2020 13:44, Boris Kolpackov wrote: Hi Roger, Thanks for getting the ball rolling. See my comments below. Roger Leigh writes: One of the issues I encountered was difficulty in building on modern platforms, Windows in particular, which was the impetus for developing the CMake build n

Re: Proposal for future development of Xerces-C 4.0.0

2020-06-19 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Roger, Thanks for getting the ball rolling. See my comments below. Roger Leigh writes: > One of the issues I encountered was difficulty in building on modern > platforms, Windows in particular, which was the impetus for developing > the CMake build now incorporated officially in the Xerces-C

Proposal for future development of Xerces-C 4.0.0

2020-06-16 Thread Roger Leigh
Dear all, To follow up to the suggestion Boris made in the discussion on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-2204, I would like to outline a proposal for the development and release of a version 4.0.0 of Xerces-C.  Being a new major version, this would allow co-installation with th