On 3/9/15, 3:54 PM, "Denis Excoffier" wrote:
>
>Would it be feasible to also include the documentation (the doc folder,
>like under xerces-c-3.1.1)?
I didn't recall the old source distribution including the API docs, but I see
it's there, I just didn't run doxygen. I'll make sure the final inclu
On 2015-03-06 16:34, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>
> A third beta with the missing test file added is now available [1]. The
> test output now matches the output checked in as a baseline.
>
> -- Scott
>
> [1] https://people.apache.org/~scantor/
Would it be feasible to also include the documentation (
On 3/6/15, 11:07 AM, "Gareth Reakes" wrote:
>
>Great. So looks like tests all pass with expected results.
Yes, at least in this case. Anybody building elsewhere, it would be good to run
that same check of course.
-- Scott
> On 6 Mar 2015, at 16:03, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>
> On 3/6/15, 10:58 AM, "Gareth Reakes" wrote:
>>
>> Are you still getting that seg fault Scott? Which test?
>
> No, should have clarified that sorry, I just didn't know how the tests were
> run or that you had a real script to run them. I was
On 3/6/15, 10:58 AM, "Gareth Reakes" wrote:
>
>Are you still getting that seg fault Scott? Which test?
No, should have clarified that sorry, I just didn't know how the tests were run
or that you had a real script to run them. I was running them by hand without
knowing what parameters to give th
Are you still getting that seg fault Scott? Which test?
G
> On 6 Mar 2015, at 15:34, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>
> A third beta with the missing test file added is now available [1]. The
> test output now matches the output checked in as a baseline.
>
> -- Scott
>
> [1] https://people.apache.or
