Boris Kolpackov wrote:
There is no such thing as BOM for UTF-8.
http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#25
a BOM can be used as a signature no matter how the Unicode text is
transformed: UTF-16, UTF-8, UTF-7, etc. The exact bytes comprising the
BOM will be whatever the Unicode character FEFF is
Actually, the XML spec discusses the UTF-8 BOM. See
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#sec-guessing-no-ext-info.
Whether it makes sense is another question. I suppose it could be used
to quickly distinguish UTF-8 from ASCII and similar encodings. Since
conforming processors are
On 10/30/07, David Bertoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would help to see the error message you're getting, and to know what
tool is issuing it.
My apologies. This is the java tool building version 2 of the xerces-c
library on windows of course
[XalanProcessor] Applying XSL sheet
Hi,
Bringing back a question from 2004 - is there a C++ version of Xerces
based on XNI? From looking at the Xerces 2.8 code it does not appear
that it is based on the XNI framework.
Thanks in advance,
Venky Raju
Senior Staff Engineer
Samsung Telecommunications America
Thanks, Michael!
Venky
-Original Message-
From: Michael Glavassevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 1:36 PM
To: c-dev@xerces.apache.org
Subject: Re: XNI-based Xerces C++
Hi Venky,
Venky Raju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/30/2007 02:28:02 PM:
Hi,
Bringing
Scott Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#25
a BOM can be used as a signature no matter how the Unicode text is
transformed: UTF-16, UTF-8, UTF-7, etc. The exact bytes comprising the
BOM will be whatever the Unicode character FEFF is converted into by
that
