The schema specification for xml:lang references internet RFC3066
as supplying the format for xml:lang content.
RFC3066 is obsoleted by RFC4646
RFC4646 is obsoleted by RFC5646
Is the xml:lang specification to follow the additional
content definitions for language tokens? If so, then the
FYI: Comparing XML-1.0 and XML-1.1 specs.
Comparing the XML 1.0-5 for name chars, the text from XML 1.1-2
has been copied into the XML 1.0-5 specification verbatum.
The distinction of control characters disallowed in XML-1.0 and
restricted in XML-1.1 still remains.
The differences in XML-1.0
Hi all,
The next board meeting is coming up on May 15th and we're due to report.
We have a deadline to submit it by this Wednesday (May 8th).
The Wiki page for the report is set up here:
http://wiki.apache.org/xerces/May2013. As usual I'll cover Xerces-J and
XML Commons. Could other
