Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-27 Thread shathawa
Boris, Are there enough new features in the trunk to warrant a 3.2 release? Just adding support for a new platform should not be considered a feature. This is why I suggested a 3.1.2 patch release. I am building and testing xerces-c from the trunk on the following platforms: VC7.1 VC8 VC9 VC10

Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-17 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
On 04/11/2013 12:59 PM, shath...@e-z.net wrote: On 4/11/13 12:35 PM, shath...@e-z.net shath...@e-z.net wrote: I don't do Debian, but those packages exist, and that is the manner in which Debian users want and need to get the software. Binaries just don't fly. I can check with Debian and

Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-11 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Scott, Cantor, Scott canto...@osu.edu writes: I'm happy to spend some time testing the build on my supported platforms once it's ready to go. Yes, that would great. The more testing we can get done, the better. I would suggest as a way of perhaps reducing time commitment than actually

Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-11 Thread shathawa
Thanks Boris! I will be glad to pursue the release issues, patches, documentation, and features. Expect to see more activity from me on these in JIRA. Steven J. Hathaway Hi Steven, shath...@e-z.net shath...@e-z.net writes: I would like to see a patch release for Xerces-C (XML Parser).

Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-11 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 4/11/13 5:03 AM, Boris Kolpackov bo...@codesynthesis.com wrote: I would suggest as a way of perhaps reducing time commitment than actually producing binaries for other than Windows is not a great use of time. Yes, I was also thinking along those lines, especially for platforms like HPUX,

Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-11 Thread shathawa
Scott Boris, Besides windows builds with VS 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2012 - I also perform builds on FreeBSD, PCBSD, and GNU Linux. I DO NOT build packages for Debian and RedHat package managers. I DO build debug and release builds of Xerces-C from sources. I can send some pings to other

Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-11 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 4/11/13 12:35 PM, shath...@e-z.net shath...@e-z.net wrote: Besides windows builds with VS 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2012 - I also perform builds on FreeBSD, PCBSD, and GNU Linux. I DO NOT build packages for Debian and RedHat package managers. I DO build debug and release builds of Xerces-C from

Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-11 Thread shathawa
On 4/11/13 12:35 PM, shath...@e-z.net shath...@e-z.net wrote: Besides windows builds with VS 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2012 - I also perform builds on FreeBSD, PCBSD, and GNU Linux. I DO NOT build packages for Debian and RedHat package managers. I DO build debug and release builds of Xerces-C from

Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-11 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 4/11/13 12:59 PM, shath...@e-z.net shath...@e-z.net wrote: I can check with Debian and Ubuntu integration teams to see what support there is to create (.deb) packages for their distributions. I can't speak for Ubuntu, but there are official shibboleth packages for Debian (that I don't

Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-10 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Steven, shath...@e-z.net shath...@e-z.net writes: I would like to see a patch release for Xerces-C (XML Parser). The current version of Xerces is 3.1.1. I propose a patch relase of Xerces-C as 3.1.2. A bugfix release (e.g., 3.1.2) would normally be released to fix something, not to add

Re: Xerces-C / Patch Release Request

2013-04-10 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 4/10/13 10:46 AM, Boris Kolpackov bo...@codesynthesis.com wrote: I was hoping to find time and make a release around June or July. It would also be a good idea to spend some time and try to fix some new bugs that have been uncovered since the 3.1.0 release. Not sure if you would like to wait