Re: Call for vote on migrating Xerces-C++ repositories to Git

Boris Kolpackov writes: > I would like to call for a vote to migrate Xerces-C++ SVN repositories > to Git, specifically, to the Apache Gitbox service: > > https://gitbox.apache.org/ The vote passes with 7 in favor and 0 against. Shortly I am going to send an email to c-dev with the proposed

Re: Call for vote on migrating Xerces-C++ repositories to Git

+1 On 22/04/2019 17:27, Boris Kolpackov wrote: I would like to call for a vote to migrate Xerces-C++ SVN repositories to Git, specifically, to the Apache Gitbox service: https://gitbox.apache.org/ This is my +1. - To

Re: Call for vote on migrating Xerces-C++ repositories to Git

+1 from me for Xerces-C++. For Xerces-J and XML commons, i'd like them to be with SVN. One of the things, that I wish for Xerces-J SVN repos, is after making archives of trunk (and emptying it) and XSD 1.1 branch, move XSD 1.1 branch codebase to trunk and retire XSD 1.1 branch. After doing this,

RE: Call for vote on migrating Xerces-C++ repositories to Git

+1 Dave Schloss -Original Message- From: Alberto Massari Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 1:39 PM To: c-dev@xerces.apache.org Subject: Re: Call for vote on migrating Xerces-C++ repositories to Git +1 Alberto Il 22/04/19 19:26, Gareth Reakes ha scritto: > > +1 > > G >

Re: Call for vote on migrating Xerces-C++ repositories to Git

+1 Alberto Il 22/04/19 19:26, Gareth Reakes ha scritto: +1 G Sent from my iPhone On 22 Apr 2019, at 18:46, Cantor, Scott wrote: +1 from me -- Scott On 4/22/19, 12:27 PM, "Boris Kolpackov" wrote: I would like to call for a vote to migrate Xerces-C++ SVN repositories to Git,

Re: Call for vote on migrating Xerces-C++ repositories to Git

+1 G Sent from my iPhone > On 22 Apr 2019, at 18:46, Cantor, Scott wrote: > > +1 from me > > -- Scott > > On 4/22/19, 12:27 PM, "Boris Kolpackov" wrote: > > I would like to call for a vote to migrate Xerces-C++ SVN repositories > to Git, specifically, to the Apache Gitbox service: >

Re: Call for vote on migrating Xerces-C++ repositories to Git

+1 from me -- Scott On 4/22/19, 12:27 PM, "Boris Kolpackov" wrote: I would like to call for a vote to migrate Xerces-C++ SVN repositories to Git, specifically, to the Apache Gitbox service: https://gitbox.apache.org/ This is my +1.

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

On 9/19/18, 8:50 AM, "Ivo Schenk" wrote: > ... well, nevermind, saw the WONTFIX at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-2009 More to the point, I don't support or care about cross compiles either, and wouldn't hold a release for them. In any case, having gotten > 3 +1 votes and no

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

Adding my +1. Thanks Scott. Michael Glavassevich XML Technologies and WAS Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org "Cantor, Scott" wrote on 09/12/2018 02:05:39 PM: > From: "Cantor, Scott" > To: "c-dev@xerces.apache.org" > Date: 09/12/2018 02:08 PM >

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

On 9/18/18, 3:16 AM, "Thomas Krebs" wrote: > I'm surprised so few Xerces-C users are out there :-( Once a project reaches this state, it's self-fulfilling because it's obviously not sensible to jump onto a dying library with new applications. If I could feasibly jump I would, but I have too

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

I would also vote +1. I'm surprised so few Xerces-C users are out there :-( Am 9/18/2018 um 7:36 AM schrieb Gareth Reakes: If you guys are happy then I am. +1 G Sent from my iPhone On 17 Sep 2018, at 23:06, Cantor, Scott wrote: On 9/17/18, 5:56 PM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: Given that

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

If you guys are happy then I am. +1 G Sent from my iPhone > On 17 Sep 2018, at 23:06, Cantor, Scott wrote: > >> On 9/17/18, 5:56 PM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: >> >> Given that it's possible to build on Cygwin and MinGW with CMake, I'm >> loath to spend further time on the Autotools build for

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

On 9/17/18, 5:56 PM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: > Given that it's possible to build on Cygwin and MinGW with CMake, I'm > loath to spend further time on the Autotools build for these platforms > given that they are a bit niche and there's little additional benefit to > be gained. If anyone really

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

On 17/09/18 21:57, Gareth Reakes wrote: I am ready to vote but wanted to see a resolution to the build issue. I thought Scott addressed this in his earlier reply: "That's autotools and since I maintain those scripts and don't support cygwin, you shouldn't expect them to work there. You'd

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

I am ready to vote but wanted to see a resolution to the build issue. G Sent from my iPhone > On 17 Sep 2018, at 21:39, Cantor, Scott wrote: > > I haven't gotten any votes, but given that and the fact that there was at > least one complaint, I'll declare a "mistrial" and await further

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

I haven't gotten any votes, but given that and the fact that there was at least one complaint, I'll declare a "mistrial" and await further instructions. I have no dog in the hunt due to there being no fixes of relevance to my work so just give a shout and I'll restart another vote and/or upload

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

This build (with make as indicated, plus -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX) is ok. However, after 'make install', there is a dangling libxerces-c.so symlink towards cygxerces-c-3-2.dll not installed (but present in build directory). Trying to use this installation fails with many many missing references

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

On 12/09/18 22:45, Denis Excoffier wrote: On 2018-09-21 at 23:31, Roger Leigh wrote: Are you building with the autotools build or the cmake build? I don't know. I run ./configure --disable-network --enable-transcoder-iconv. No cmake around (although the cmake and libcurl-devel packages are

RE: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

> > Are you building with the autotools build or the cmake build? > I don't know. I run ./configure --disable-network --enable-transcoder-iconv. > No > cmake around (although the cmake and libcurl-devel packages are present). That's autotools and since I maintain those scripts and don't support

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

> On 2018-09-21 at 23:31, Roger Leigh wrote: > > Are you building with the autotools build or the cmake build? I don't know. I run ./configure --disable-network --enable-transcoder-iconv. No cmake around (although the cmake and libcurl-devel packages are present). Regards, Denis Excoffier.

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

Forgot to mention that i also tried to build on Linux 32bits (Debian 7), solaris 2.10 and darwin 17.7.0, and succeeded with no problem. > On 2018-09-12 at 23:21, Denis Excoffier wrote: > > Hello, > > Don't know whether it's wise or appropriate to vote +1 and also report an > error (minor): on

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

Are you building with the autotools build or the cmake build? There are two cygwin variants tested with cmake here for : https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/xerces-c/build/1.0.66 for the latest commit (https://github.com/apache/xerces-c/commits/trunk), which are building

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

Hello, Don't know whether it's wise or appropriate to vote +1 and also report an error (minor): on a clean and up-to-date cygwin (windows 10, x86_64, pre-2.11.2), i had to remove the two lines: template class ArrayJanitor; template class ArrayJanitor; in src/xercesc/util/JanitorExports.cpp to

RE: Call for vote

With several +1 votes and no objections, the vote has passed and I will finalize the release tomorrow morning. Thanks, -- Scott > -Original Message- > From: Cantor, Scott > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 12:32 PM > To: c-dev@xerces.apache.org > Subject: Call for vote > > I've done a

Re: Call for vote

I thought I replied but can’t see it so just in case +1 G > On 24 Jun 2016, at 17:00, Michael Glavassevich wrote: > > +1. Thanks Scott! > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Technologies and WAS Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com > E-mail:

Re: Call for vote

+1. Thanks Scott! Michael Glavassevich XML Technologies and WAS Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org "Cantor, Scott" wrote on 06/22/2016 12:31:42 PM: > I've done a bit of minor cleanup (removing .svn detritus) and posted > new

Re: Call for vote

+1, Thanks Scott! Unfortunately couldn't find time to test. Boris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org

RE: Call for vote

> Couldn't you find a more recent config.guess? See for example the one in > gcc-6.1.0.tar.bz2, dated 2016-01-01. I built it on Red Hat 7. I assume autoreconf pulls in whatever is there. -- Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Call for vote

> On 2016-06-22 18:31, Cantor, Scott wrote: > > I've done a bit of minor cleanup (removing .svn detritus) and posted new > artifacts with signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xerces/c/3/sources/ Couldn't you find a more recent config.guess? See for example the one in