On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 22:21 +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Does Cabal not support things like packages within a package simply
because Haskell libraries currently are not complex enough to require
such a feature, or is there a guiding design principle with which
these features are
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 22:21 +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Does Cabal not support things like packages within a package simply
because Haskell libraries currently are not complex enough to require
such a feature, or is there a guiding design
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, John D. Ramsdell wrote:
Henning Thielemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It was requested several times but it seems not to be designed and
implemented so easily.
I bet it's easier than you think. You just have to dynamically
generate package configuration files, just
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 09:03 -0400, John D. Ramsdell wrote:
Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The design choice is that the Cabal package is the unit of
distribution. Of course what one sees as a system may well consist
of multiple interdependent packages.
I think developers want
Thu Sep 6 14:31:32 PDT 2007 Clemens Fruhwirth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add shared library building to GHC module (also via Makefile)
M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC.hs -25 +67
M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC/Makefile.in -3 +16
M ./Distribution/Simple/Install.hs -3 +1
Thu Sep 6 14:35:07 PDT 2007 Clemens Fruhwirth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Update D.S.GHC/Makefile.hs
M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC/Makefile.hs -1 +1
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
Fri Sep 7 07:07:31 PDT 2007 Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* warning police
M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC.hs -6 +6
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
Wed Sep 26 02:00:25 PDT 2007 Clemens Fruhwirth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add -package-name to GHC invocation when linking DSOs
M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC.hs -1 +2
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
Thu Sep 27 05:39:23 PDT 2007 Clemens Fruhwirth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add extra-libs to shared library linking
M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC.hs -1 +6
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
Tue Oct 23 05:24:17 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Be explicit about the base version dependency
don't just leave it up to the default search order
M ./Cabal.cabal -2 +3
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
Tue Oct 23 02:31:11 PDT 2007 Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Refuse to run any commands if the .cabal has been modified
See GHC bug #1372
This is a consistency check, intended to prevent this class of build
failures:
* Package P is updated, its version number is bumped, the
Tue Oct 23 11:37:38 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Only use ld -x on systems where ld supports that.
Hopefully this fixes it for both ordinary builds and via ghc makefiles.
M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC.hs -5 +25
M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC/Makefile.in -1 +1
Tue Oct 23 11:38:04 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Regenerate GHC/Makefile.hs from GHC/Makefile.in
M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC/Makefile.hs -1 +1
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
Tue Oct 23 11:42:10 PDT 2007 Ross Paterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* pass cpp-options to cpphs
M ./Distribution/Simple/PreProcess.hs -1 +1
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
Wed Oct 24 06:35:54 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Create the dist/ dir early in the configuration process
M ./Distribution/Simple/Configure.hs -1 +3
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
Wed Oct 24 08:05:05 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Compile a .c rather than a .hs file to make a .o file in ld -x configure
test
Since when bootstrapping ghc we're not in any position to compile .hs files
that easily.
M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC.hs -4 +4
Wed Oct 24 09:07:58 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Adjust verbosity of a step in configure
M ./Distribution/Simple/Configure.hs -1 +1
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 13:08 -0400, John D. Ramsdell wrote:
Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think I'm claiming that developers want support for developing
systems as a unit but distribution can be as a collection of
components rather than as a unit.
Do you believe it is a bad
Here's a patch that fixes a bug in the Unlit pre-processor.
New patches:
[Fix a bug in the Unlit pre-processor
David Waern [EMAIL PROTECTED]**20071024181908
With this patch, unlit can handle line pragmas with filenames that contain
spaces.
] {
hunk ./Distribution/Simple/PreProcess/Unlit.hs 36
-
Duncan Coutts wrote:
We'd like to kill off autoconf as much as possible. :-)
+1
--
Ashley Yakeley
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
Wed Oct 24 09:07:58 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Adjust verbosity of a step in configure
M ./Distribution/Simple/Configure.hs -1 +1
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
21 matches
Mail list logo
