On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Conrad Parker wrote:
>
> I think we should avoid manual approvals; I know several people who
> have excellent, working, used in-production, cabalified Haskell code
> but for whatever reason they are reluctant to request an account --
> however they have code on git
On 3 July 2012 03:14, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 12:25 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm planning to spend some time, on behalf of the Industrial Haskell
>> Group, working on Hackage 2 in the coming weeks.
>
> [..]
>
>> So that leaves 3 tickets as blockers:
>>
>> #911
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 12:25 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm planning to spend some time, on behalf of the Industrial Haskell
> Group, working on Hackage 2 in the coming weeks.
[..]
> Now #913 I assume is not a blocker. #919 I assume is also not a blocker.
> And #914 and #915 are impro
Hi all,
I'm planning to spend some time, on behalf of the Industrial Haskell
Group, working on Hackage 2 in the coming weeks.
As such, I've been trying to work out what the blockers are in terms of
actually getting the hackage 2 server live. I've started from the
"Current TODOs" section of
h
