On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Erik Hesselink hessel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Leon Smith leon.p.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I tried to upload the most recent version of postgresql-simple, and I
couldn't because I'm not the maintainer for that package.
What is
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps a separate command, cabal init-sandbox, would be the best
approach. Running that command would create the right package
environment for running in a sandbox and the remaining commands would
then use that
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:42:34PM -0500, Antoine Latter wrote:
After digging a bit, the code that does this is a part of converting
the legacy data into the new-style backup tarball. I'm too behind on
how things work to know if that's still a thing that happens or is at
all useful :-)
I
Reverse dependencies can mean different things. The current implementation
answers these questions:
1. What are the packages for which the latest version depends directly on a
given version of foo?
2. What are the packages for which only previous or deprecated versions
depend directly on a given
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Mikhail Glushenkov
the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps a separate command, cabal init-sandbox, would be the best
approach. Running that command would create the
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's have sandbox-init not take any configure arguments. It should
just mark that the current repo should use a sandbox until
sandbox-delete is run.
It'll still be a bit confusing:
$ cabal sandbox-init
$ cabal
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov
the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's an idea: as a compromise we can have cabal build imply
reb-building and installing only add-source dependencies. This means
nothing has to be downloaded from the internet. Lets not worry about
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov
the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's have sandbox-init not take any configure arguments. It should
just mark that the current repo should use a sandbox
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov
the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov
the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's an idea: as a compromise we can have cabal build imply
reb-building and installing only add-source
On Aug 31, 2012 11:56 AM, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:42:34PM -0500, Antoine Latter wrote:
After digging a bit, the code that does this is a part of converting
the legacy data into the new-style backup tarball. I'm too behind on
how things work to
10 matches
Mail list logo
