On Aug 31, 2012 11:56 AM, "Ian Lynagh" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:42:34PM -0500, Antoine Latter wrote:
> >
> > After digging a bit, the code that does this is a part of converting
> > the legacy data into the new-style backup tarball. I'm too behind on
> > how things work to know if tha
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov
> wrote:
>>
>>> Here's an idea: as a compromise we can have cabal build imply
>>> reb-building and installing only add-source dependencies. This means
>>> nothing has to be dow
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:
>>
>> Let's have sandbox-init not take any configure arguments. It should
>> just mark that the current repo should use a sandbox until
>> sandbox-delete is run.
>
> It'll st
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov
wrote:
>
>> Here's an idea: as a compromise we can have cabal build imply
>> reb-building and installing only add-source dependencies. This means
>> nothing has to be downloaded from the internet. Lets not worry about
>> minimize rebuilding
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:
>
> Let's have sandbox-init not take any configure arguments. It should
> just mark that the current repo should use a sandbox until
> sandbox-delete is run.
It'll still be a bit confusing:
$ cabal sandbox-init
$ cabal install --only-depe
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Mikhail Glushenkov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:
>
>> Perhaps a separate command, cabal init-sandbox, would be the best
>> approach. Running that command would create the right package
>> environment for running in a sa
Reverse dependencies can mean different things. The current implementation
answers these questions:
1. What are the packages for which the latest version depends directly on a
given version of foo?
2. What are the packages for which only previous or deprecated versions
depend directly on a given ve
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:42:34PM -0500, Antoine Latter wrote:
>
> After digging a bit, the code that does this is a part of converting
> the legacy data into the new-style backup tarball. I'm too behind on
> how things work to know if that's still a thing that happens or is at
> all useful :-)
I
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:
> Perhaps a separate command, cabal init-sandbox, would be the best
> approach. Running that command would create the right package
> environment for running in a sandbox and the remaining commands would
> then use that sandbox. Separating
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Erik Hesselink wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Leon Smith wrote:
>> Ok, I tried to upload the most recent version of postgresql-simple, and I
>> couldn't because I'm not the maintainer for that package.
>
> What is your account name? I can add you as a
10 matches
Mail list logo
