On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Duncan Coutts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following hackage packages specify in their .cabal file:
license: BSD4
Which is the 4-clause BSD license, ie the one with the advertising
clause.
cabal-upload-0.3
Chart-0.5
FiniteMap-0.1
haxr-3000.0.1
On May 3, 2007, at 22:45 , Duncan Coutts wrote:
...
I was also trying cabal-upload. I found that cabal-upload needs some
functions from the HTTP lib that are not actually exported. In
particular the stuff to do with authorisation in the Browser
module. It
looks like it ought to be exported
On Feb 3, 2007, at 21:37 , Isaac Jones wrote:
The way I propose to solve this version incompatibility problem in the
short term is to use the testing hackage repository to collect
packages that are known to work together. For instance, we could put
haxml 1.17 in and only allow things that
On Jan 15, 2007, at 14:43 , Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
After going through pain with dependancy hell (like .dll hell, but
cross platform) I finally got cabal-install to build.
The list command looked most interesting, but:
D:\sources\contrib\Cabal\cabal-installcabal-install list
On Jan 15, 2007, at 16:54 , Simon Marlow wrote:
Ross Paterson wrote:
Björn Bringert suggested that the Hackage page for a package should
include a link to the Darcs repo (if any, but who uses anything
else?)
and maybe some darcs integration such as changelogs and the like.
To make this