Re: every use of BSD4 on hackage is incorrect

2008-03-01 Thread Bjorn Bringert
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following hackage packages specify in their .cabal file: license: BSD4 Which is the 4-clause BSD license, ie the one with the advertising clause. cabal-upload-0.3 Chart-0.5 FiniteMap-0.1 haxr-3000.0.1

Re: cabal-upload cabal-install

2007-05-04 Thread Bjorn Bringert
On May 3, 2007, at 22:45 , Duncan Coutts wrote: ... I was also trying cabal-upload. I found that cabal-upload needs some functions from the HTTP lib that are not actually exported. In particular the stuff to do with authorisation in the Browser module. It looks like it ought to be exported

Re: Dependencies/backwards compatibility in Hackage

2007-02-04 Thread Bjorn Bringert
On Feb 3, 2007, at 21:37 , Isaac Jones wrote: The way I propose to solve this version incompatibility problem in the short term is to use the testing hackage repository to collect packages that are known to work together. For instance, we could put haxml 1.17 in and only allow things that

Re: Using Cabal for dependancies

2007-01-15 Thread Bjorn Bringert
On Jan 15, 2007, at 14:43 , Neil Mitchell wrote: Hi Bjorn, After going through pain with dependancy hell (like .dll hell, but cross platform) I finally got cabal-install to build. The list command looked most interesting, but: D:\sources\contrib\Cabal\cabal-installcabal-install list

Re: new Darcs-Repository field?

2007-01-15 Thread Bjorn Bringert
On Jan 15, 2007, at 16:54 , Simon Marlow wrote: Ross Paterson wrote: Björn Bringert suggested that the Hackage page for a package should include a link to the Darcs repo (if any, but who uses anything else?) and maybe some darcs integration such as changelogs and the like. To make this