Sorry if this is "me too" noise, but I can't help sending
Bardur a huge thank you for the fantastic work on the
issues list. It's hard to overestimate the value of this.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 4:20 AM Bardur Arantsson
wrote:
> On 06/27/2015 03:14 AM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> > On 06/25/2015 07
On 06/27/2015 03:14 AM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 07:12 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>> On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As some of the project owners have probably noticed (hi, sorry about the
>>> ticket spam!),
>>
>> Sorry about even more spam, but
On 06/25/2015 07:12 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As some of the project owners have probably noticed (hi, sorry about the
>> ticket spam!),
>
> Sorry about even more spam, but it's become a sort of perverse pursuit
> to see if I ca
Hi Bardur,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
> [--snip rant, again :)--]
>
> So, I've been going over even more issues for a few hours and the
> overwhelming feeling I'm sensing is apathy/indifference. (I shoul
On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
[--snip rant, again :)--]
So, I've been going over even more issues for a few hours and the
overwhelming feeling I'm sensing is apathy/indifference. (I should say
these are mostly the issues imported from Trac, so I'm sure there's a
cert
On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As some of the project owners have probably noticed (hi, sorry about the
> ticket spam!),
Sorry about even more spam, but it's become a sort of perverse pursuit
to see if I can bring the issue list down to 23(!) pages at this point.
;
On 06/25/2015 06:54 PM, John Alfred Nathanael Chee wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Bardur Arantsson
> wrote:
>
>> Do people
>> spontaneously clean up TODOs that others have left behind?
>>
>
> There's been a case where a TODO was nullified by resolving an issue on
> Github, in that cas
On 06/25/2015 06:32 PM, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:55:47PM +0200, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>> I noticed another thing while perusing the source code: There seem to be
>> quite a few TODO comments scattered about.
>>
>> Is there some sort of convention whereby it is permitted
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Bardur Arantsson
wrote:
> Do people
> spontaneously clean up TODOs that others have left behind?
>
There's been a case where a TODO was nullified by resolving an issue on
Github, in that case I deleted the TODO.
If you understand the code well enough to understa
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:55:47PM +0200, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> I noticed another thing while perusing the source code: There seem to be
> quite a few TODO comments scattered about.
>
> Is there some sort of convention whereby it is permitted to add TODOs as
> long as the person doing so pinki
On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
[--snip rant--]
I noticed another thing while perusing the source code: There seem to be
quite a few TODO comments scattered about.
Is there some sort of convention whereby it is permitted to add TODOs as
long as the person doing so pin
Hi all,
(When I refer to cabal below, I'm mainly referring to cabal-install.)
As some of the project owners have probably noticed (hi, sorry about the
ticket spam!), I've been sampling a few issues from the issue tracker
here and there to look into the potential issues I could tackle and
which wo
12 matches
Mail list logo
