On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Duncan Coutts
wrote:
> I still disagree that going with an external SQL db will be easier.
> The big advantage of the acid-state (and similar) data stores is that
> they let us use Haskell types properly and don't imply a separate
> external data model and a marshal
On 3 July 2012 20:38, Johan Tibell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Duncan Coutts
> wrote:
>> Something to keep in mind is memory usage. I know Jeremy is looking at
>> this from the infrastructure side, but I think from the app side there's
>> also some likely culprits. Cabal's GenericPac
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Duncan Coutts
wrote:
> Something to keep in mind is memory usage. I know Jeremy is looking at
> this from the infrastructure side, but I think from the app side there's
> also some likely culprits. Cabal's GenericPackageDescription type is
> very large in memory. Ha
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 08:14:01PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
>> Something to keep in mind is memory usage.
>
> Will do, but currently I don't think this is a blocker for deploying
> 2.0.
>
Isn't it the reason why the test server
(http://hackag
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 08:14:01PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 12:25 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> > Conclusion
> > --
> >
> > I think the following are the blockers for deploying Hackage 2:
> >
> > * #911 upload perms; may be good enough already
> > * #916 check U
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Conrad Parker wrote:
>
> I think we should avoid manual approvals; I know several people who
> have excellent, working, used in-production, cabalified Haskell code
> but for whatever reason they are reluctant to request an account --
> however they have code on git
On 3 July 2012 03:14, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 12:25 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm planning to spend some time, on behalf of the Industrial Haskell
>> Group, working on Hackage 2 in the coming weeks.
>
> [..]
>
>> So that leaves 3 tickets as blockers:
>>
>> #911
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 12:25 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm planning to spend some time, on behalf of the Industrial Haskell
> Group, working on Hackage 2 in the coming weeks.
[..]
> Now #913 I assume is not a blocker. #919 I assume is also not a blocker.
> And #914 and #915 are impro
