Sorry if this is "me too" noise, but I can't help sending
Bardur a huge thank you for the fantastic work on the
issues list. It's hard to overestimate the value of this.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 4:20 AM Bardur Arantsson
wrote:
> On 06/27/2015 03:14 AM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> > On 06/25/2015 07
On 06/27/2015 03:14 AM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 07:12 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>> On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As some of the project owners have probably noticed (hi, sorry about the
>>> ticket spam!),
>>
>> Sorry about even more spam, but
On 06/25/2015 07:12 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As some of the project owners have probably noticed (hi, sorry about the
>> ticket spam!),
>
> Sorry about even more spam, but it's become a sort of perverse pursuit
> to see if I ca
Hi Bardur,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
> [--snip rant, again :)--]
>
> So, I've been going over even more issues for a few hours and the
> overwhelming feeling I'm sensing is apathy/indifference. (I shoul
On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
[--snip rant, again :)--]
So, I've been going over even more issues for a few hours and the
overwhelming feeling I'm sensing is apathy/indifference. (I should say
these are mostly the issues imported from Trac, so I'm sure there's a
cert
On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As some of the project owners have probably noticed (hi, sorry about the
> ticket spam!),
Sorry about even more spam, but it's become a sort of perverse pursuit
to see if I can bring the issue list down to 23(!) pages at this point.
;
On 06/25/2015 06:54 PM, John Alfred Nathanael Chee wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Bardur Arantsson
> wrote:
>
>> Do people
>> spontaneously clean up TODOs that others have left behind?
>>
>
> There's been a case where a TODO was nullified by resolving an issue on
> Github, in that cas
On 06/25/2015 06:32 PM, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:55:47PM +0200, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>> I noticed another thing while perusing the source code: There seem to be
>> quite a few TODO comments scattered about.
>>
>> Is there some sort of convention whereby it is permitted
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Bardur Arantsson
wrote:
> Do people
> spontaneously clean up TODOs that others have left behind?
>
There's been a case where a TODO was nullified by resolving an issue on
Github, in that case I deleted the TODO.
If you understand the code well enough to understa
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:55:47PM +0200, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> I noticed another thing while perusing the source code: There seem to be
> quite a few TODO comments scattered about.
>
> Is there some sort of convention whereby it is permitted to add TODOs as
> long as the person doing so pinki
On 06/25/2015 03:16 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
[--snip rant--]
I noticed another thing while perusing the source code: There seem to be
quite a few TODO comments scattered about.
Is there some sort of convention whereby it is permitted to add TODOs as
long as the person doing so pin
11 matches
Mail list logo
