On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Simon Hengel wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:54:34AM -0800, Johan Tibell wrote:
>> We may very well end up doing this. There's no rush to make it
>> default. We can make a release with opt-in sandboxes and decide three
>> months later if we want to make it the
Hi all,
So, any feedback for this? I still think it is a good idea to move the filetime
change check for a preprocessed file from preprocessFile to
mkSimplePreProcessor (both in Distribution.Simple.PreProcess). This gives
preprocessors the flexibility to define their own dependency tracking, an
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:54:34AM -0800, Johan Tibell wrote:
> We may very well end up doing this. There's no rush to make it
> default. We can make a release with opt-in sandboxes and decide three
> months later if we want to make it the default.
Nice.
So I guess the idea is that we will have a
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:33:05PM +0100, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote:
> > So personally I think it is a better approach to first release the
> > feature, and give people time to try whether there use case are covered.
>
> The idea is to put out a release candidate some time before the final
> releas
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Simon Hengel wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:22:36AM -0700, Johan Tibell wrote:
>> *Sandboxing should be used by default*
>
> I'm a little bit late on this one. But I'm somewhat skeptical here. As
> I understand it, the sandboxing fea
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Simon Hengel wrote:
>
> So personally I think it is a better approach to first release the
> feature, and give people time to try whether there use case are covered.
The idea is to put out a release candidate some time before the final
release to give people
Hi Johan,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:22:36AM -0700, Johan Tibell wrote:
> *Sandboxing should be used by default*
I'm a little bit late on this one. But I'm somewhat skeptical here. As
I understand it, the sandboxing feature is not yet released. I think
there is a chance that the first version
Thu Nov 29 11:16:07 GMT 2012 Edsko de Vries
* Fix import for build reports
Ignore-this: c29ac5975354c117184b101e848272d4
Next up: try to do this in a pure fashion
M ./Distribution/Server/Features/BuildReports/Backup.hs -2 +2
___
cabal-de
Thu Nov 29 10:36:19 GMT 2012 Edsko de Vries
* Fix comparison on tarballs
Ignore-this: 648378d5c1cdccfb8db791fe524f64ce
If the tarballs didn't contain the exact same entries, in the exact same
order,
then `equalTarBall` would report lots of superfluous errors due to a call to
`mergeB
