> The big question we have to answer first is, how do we want to support SSL?
> Do we want to use an existing, well-tested, well scrutinized SSL
> implementation and FFI bind to it? If so, which one and why? If not, are we
> comfortable enough with writing a correct SSL implementation? That's very
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> On 2014-04-01 at 22:43:47 +0200, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
> > Turns out cabal-install itself uses HTTP. (Try to grep for "hackage" in
> > the source tree.) Is it due to the HTTP library, which doesn't support
> > HTTPS (4000.2.12
On 2014-04-01 at 22:43:47 +0200, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
> Turns out cabal-install itself uses HTTP. (Try to grep for “hackage” in
> the source tree.) Is it due to the HTTP library, which doesn’t support
> HTTPS (4000.2.12 returns “user error (https not supported)”)?
>
> Is there any interest in
