RE: draft proposal on provenance-qualified dependencies

2018-02-23 Thread Simon Peyton Jones
| current existing "search path-like" functionality where a chain of | overlays may live over a repo. The proposal does not address that, | because it is how things work already -- although arguably, the way in | which this works may be insufficiently understood among existing cabal | users?

Re: draft proposal on provenance-qualified dependencies

2018-02-23 Thread Gershom B
Thanks for these comments Simon. It is good to have a sanity-check on these proposals before they go before a broad audience. I'll try to take them into account and submit this properly as a proposal (including creating the associated discussion thread) in the next few days. If anyone else has any

RE: draft proposal on provenance-qualified dependencies

2018-02-23 Thread Simon Peyton Jones
Gershom Looks like a great idea. Lots of questions though: - I think more motivation would be helpful. E.g. "You are in change of the GHC 8.6 release. Package authors don't want to upload a new version of their packages until 8.6 is out, but you still want to smoke-test 8.6 against