Re: Patch to read package-specific cabal-install config

of specifying 1 remote-repo in the config file is. The idea we had was to enable 'cabal upload' both for public packages going to public Hackage and for private packages going to a private Hackage. Does that make sense or am I missing something? Carl On 10/01/2012 09:33, Erik Hesselink wrote

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cabal #11

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote: I was fooling around a bit with the build (it now includes test reports!). Sorry for the noise. The build now seems to be stable so I've added

Re: Hackage2 server ready for testing

Hi Ian, Looks great, thanks for the work! One question: I see the reverse dependencies have been disabled, darcs says for 'performance problems'. Do you have some details? Do you think it is hard to fix? I wouldn't mind doing some permission granting for the testing period, by the way. Erik On

Uploading imported package to hackage 2

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Erik Hesselink hessel...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Leon Smith leon.p.sm...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I tried to upload the most recent version of postgresql-simple, and I couldn't because I'm not the maintainer for that package. What

Re: Uploading imported package to hackage 2

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:27:46AM +0200, Erik Hesselink wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Erik Hesselink hessel...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Leon Smith leon.p.sm...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I

Re: Uploading imported package to hackage 2

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 07:11:54PM +0200, Erik Hesselink wrote: It's still not working. I'm trying to upload a new version of kqueue (0.1.2.4). I start from http://new-hackage.haskell.org/packages/upload, select the file

Re: Hackage 2

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 01:57:55AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:13:01PM -0400, Leon Smith wrote: Ok, I tried to upload the most recent version of postgresql-simple, and I couldn't because I'm not

Re: Hackage 2

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Ross Paterson r...@soi.city.ac.uk wrote: In Hackage 1 packages can be deprecated, optionally indicating a recommended replacement (the deprecated and superseded by fields of the per-package tags file), e.g. partial-lens and binary-strict-0.3.1. These don't seem

Re: Hackage 2

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Leon Smith leon.p.sm...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Erik Hesselink hessel...@gmail.com wrote: I think that the eventual situation should have per-package uploaders. It just seems to dangerous for anyone to be able to upload any package

Re: Hackage 2

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Matthew Gruen wikigraceno...@gmail.com wrote: I'm a little bit confused on the exact set up. The uploaders group seems to be roughly the same thing as the trustees group. (Except uploaders has an AND relationship with per-package groups as far as membership

Re: Hackage 2 and acid-state vs traditional databases

Hi Ian, We used acid-state (actually happstack-state) at Silk for our session store. We had the same problems you describe: slow shutdown/startup, high memory usage, unable to inspect the data. We recently switched to an SQL database. Just another data point. Erik On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:49

Re: Hackage 2 blocking tickets

Hi Ian, I created a ticket for hackage2. Should I mark it as such (but not important)? Or will that interfere with this list? Erik On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: Hi all, FYI, I've been making tickets labelled 'hackage2' and 'important' for issues that

Re: Hackage 2 blocking tickets

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Erik Hesselink wrote: I created a ticket for hackage2. Should I mark it as such (but not important)? Or will that interfere with this list? Definitely mark it hackage2. Mark

Re: [Haskell] Hackage2 server testing

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:55:30AM +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote: Next test: I have successfully uploaded a package candidate of 'gnuplot'. Now I go to the gnuplot candidate page and click on [maintain]. Then I get a

Re: ANN: cabal-install-1.16.0 (and Cabal-1.16.0.1)

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote: On the behalf of the many contributors to cabal, I'm proud to present cabal-install-1.16.0. Congratulations and thanks to all those involved! To install: cabal update cabal install cabal-install-1.16.0

Hackage 2 trustees

Hi all, I just upgraded our internal hackage to the latest HEAD. I found that the behavior of the 'trustees' group has changed. Previously, they could upload any (existing) package, but that doesn't work anymore. This functionality was very useful for us, since otherwise, we'd have to add all our

Re: [Haskell] ANN: Cabal v1.18.0 released

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Henning Thielemann lemm...@henning-thielemann.de wrote: On Wed, 4 Sep 2013, Johan Tibell wrote: * GHCi support. It's now much easier to use ghci when developing your packages, especially if those packages require preprocessors (e.g. hsc2hs). That's a great

Re: Feature Idea: --no-remote-fetching flag

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Adam Foltzer acfolt...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote: I would like for there to be a both a command line flag and a ~/.cabal/config setting (there isn't one already, is there?) Please let me know if

Re: Get all the processed sources for a cabal project

I don't know of anything taking into account the current configuration. There is cabal sdist --list-sources, which will list all the files that would be written to a source distribution. Alternatively, there is the output from 'ghc -M', which generates dependencies in Makefile format. Neither

Re: Warning about missing modules in 'other-modules'

On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Daniel Trstenjak daniel.trsten...@gmail.com wrote: It would be nice if 'cabal sdist' or 'cabal upload' would warn the user about missing modules. This was built to run during 'cabal build' [0] but deemed too slow. See the issue for a possible future direction.

Re: Cabal File Pretty Printer

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tillmann Rendel ren...@informatik.uni-marburg.de wrote: 1. change `cabal init` to use the pretty printer. 2. expose the pretty printer at the command line. Agreed on both points.

Re: Themes for 1.22

You can handle this scenario pretty easily by setting up a private hackage. Then add a second remote-repo to your cabal config, either globally or in the sandbox. We do this, and it works pretty well. Regards, Erik On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Benjamin Edwards edwards.b...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Cabal problem

Could it be this problem? https://plus.google.com/115504368969270249241/posts/19fyYuT5C1i Regards, Erik On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Simon Peyton Jones simo...@microsoft.com wrote: Dear Cabal-ers I have downloaded a binary installation of GHC 7.8.2, for Linux. Now I want to install

Re: Showing last 10 lines of the build log

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Bardur Arantsson s...@scientician.net wrote: On 2014-05-10 18:27, Bardur Arantsson wrote: So, here's a little feature request: Couldn't we just have cabal install spit out the full build log in case a build fails? Is there any real disadvantage that I'm not

Re: Cabal Preprocessor Defines

The way I usually do this, is your last option: I define 'CPP-Options: -DDEBUG' in the cabal file. I don't know why this doesn't work for you. Perhaps it is the final 'install' command, which duplicates the configure and build, but doesn't have the flag? You could try again with only 'cabal

Re: Upper bound on time in Cabal causes build failure

It would perhaps be worth it for someone with the right permissions to edit the (five) old versions on hackage, and add upper bounds. That way cabal install wouldn't use this very old version assuming it works (it probably doesn't). Erik On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Toby Goodwin

Re: Please review: new wiki page with release instructions

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On 17 March 2015 at 16:15, Thomas Tuegel ttue...@gmail.com wrote: Otherwise, please alert me if you have any blocking issues; AFAIK there are none at this time. There are two test cases that are

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Doc generation?

Note that if you do this, people who install your package will locally still have the documentation bug, so it's probably better to upload a new version anyway. Erik On 20 January 2016 at 13:41, Oliver Charles wrote: > This would require the ability to re-upload a package