Re: be friendlier to user (was Re: What's next?)

2013-09-07 Thread Dag Odenhall
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel h...@gnu.org wrote: sounds like https://github.com/haskell/cabal/pull/1455 That‘s great if they’re adding a warning for modules, but it'd be even better if it would warn about any missing files not just modules. For example,

Re: Gearing up for a 1.18 release

2013-08-26 Thread Dag Odenhall
I definitely think impl(ghc) should cover GHCJS, as it effectively just is a GHC backend (even if not part of GHC). Doing otherwise would be a bit like having impl(ghc) be false when compiling with -fllvm IMHO. The value of GHCJS is that it's supposed to be able to compile most existing packages