On 7 September 2011 20:14, Thomas Tuegel ttue...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings once again!
I have attached an updated patch with the requested changes to the
test interface. (I apologize for the delay; it was caused by the
unfortunate conspiracy of moving, not having internet access, and
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 11:16 +0200, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:
Hi Duncan,
Is there a planned date for a release which will have the detailed test
interface?
My hope is that it'll be ready in time to be included in a release of
Cabal to go along with GHC 7.4 towards the end of the year.
If
Hi,
2011/9/9 Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 11:16 +0200, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:
Hi Duncan,
Is there a planned date for a release which will have the detailed test
interface?
My hope is that it'll be ready in time to be included in a release of
Hi Duncan,
Is there a planned date for a release which will have the detailed test
interface?
Thanks,
Pedro
2011/9/5 Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:30 +0200, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to use the detailed-1.0 test interface,
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:30 +0200, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to use the detailed-1.0 test interface, according to the
instructions on http://www.haskell.org/cabal/users-guide/#test-suites.
Ah, a rare case of premature documentation. That is, documentation for a
feature that
Hi all,
I tried to use the detailed-1.0 test interface, according to the
instructions on http://www.haskell.org/cabal/users-guide/#test-suites. What
I got:
bash-3.2$ cabal --version
cabal-install version 0.10.2
using version 1.10.2.0 of the Cabal library
bash-3.2$ cabal configure
cabal:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 14:23 -0500, Thomas Tuegel wrote:
Johan and I are talking about renaming the Tests type to just Test
to be more consistent about pluralization. So, also incorporating the
changes I think you are suggesting to the Group type, it would look
like:
data Test
= Test
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 21:25 -0500, Thomas Tuegel wrote:
I can see the utility of this. It would be simple enough to have Group
take an (IO [Tests]) instead of just [Tests].
Note that that's not quite the same
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 21:25 -0500, Thomas Tuegel wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Speaking of IO, do we ever need to deal with test suites that need
imperative setup and teardown for sets of tests? Individual tests can do
setup and
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Thomas Tuegel ttue...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
* Having the top-level 'tests' binding be IO Tests, instead of IO
[Tests], is a bit inconvenient. It forces the users to always use at
least one
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Q: what should 'concurrently' mean for a test group that contains other
test groups? Suppose a test group asks for serial execution, does that
mean it's ok to run tests in a sub-group in parallel with each
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
A few notes:
* Calling the data type that contains the Test, Group, and
ExtraOptions constructor Tests feels a bit weird, as you often end up
having to give a list of these e.g. to the Group constructor. You end
up
Curious about how a user of this API would look like I converted the
parts of the test-framework API I use (for QC2 tests) to use the Cabal
API.
-- Converting a QC2 property to a Cabal test type.
type TestName = String
testProperty :: Testable a = TestName - a - Tests
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 19:38 -0500, Thomas Tuegel wrote:
Greetings interested Cabal users and developers!
I am pleased to present another revision of Cabal's detailed test
interface for your scrutiny.
First of all, thanks for going over this again. I think we're getting
closer.
Probably
Greetings interested Cabal users and developers!
I am pleased to present another revision of Cabal's detailed test
interface for your scrutiny. I have attached a patch for the Cabal
repository to this message so you can try the new interface and test
runner for yourselves, but the interface from
15 matches
Mail list logo
