On 10 October 2011 00:30, Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, all committed now except for one of the cabal-install patches.
Thanks!
I've not yet applied the cabal-install patch that makes the haddock
options available via cabal install. I'm not sure about making them
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 22:26 +0100, Max Bolingbroke wrote:
Hi Hackagers,
I've written a rough-and-ready documentation building service for the
Hackage 2.0 effort. It is functional enough to submit build reports
and build documentation for a few example packages on my local Hackage
instance.
Max Bolingbroke wrote:
On 3 October 2011 21:30, Paterson, Ross r.pater...@city.ac.uk wrote:
Don't you need #517 to get the cross-package links to go to the right
places?
I didn't realise there was a ticket open for that. It's part of the
changes that my patches make to cabal-install.
Oh,
On 3 October 2011 21:30, Paterson, Ross r.pater...@city.ac.uk wrote:
Don't you need #517 to get the cross-package links to go to the right places?
I didn't realise there was a ticket open for that. It's part of the
changes that my patches make to cabal-install.
Max
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 22:26 +0100, Max Bolingbroke wrote:
Hi Hackagers,
I've written a rough-and-ready documentation building service for the
Hackage 2.0 effort. It is functional enough to submit build reports
and build documentation for a few example packages on my local Hackage
instance.
Max Bolingbroke writes:
I've written a rough-and-ready documentation building service for the
Hackage 2.0 effort. It is functional enough to submit build reports
and build documentation for a few example packages on my local Hackage
instance.
Don't you need #517 to get the cross-package links
On 28 September 2011 22:26, Max Bolingbroke batterseapo...@hotmail.com wrote:
I also had to make some small changes to
cabal-install that should go into the Cabal repo.
FYI I have found the patch Only use -i. when compiling the Cabal
package breaks some things and is not even really necessary.
