On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 01:19:34PM -0400, Carter Schonwald wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Francesco Ariis fa...@ariis.it wrote:
My view is that, with an expressive enough License datatype which covers
an ample portion of usages, the warning could still be pragmatically
useful (do
414d8e09eee0b4090c9e7dd2e808be37ac8e4d53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francesco Ariis fa...@ariis.it
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 15:29:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Improved checkLicence warnings on AllRightsReserved and
OtherLicense
---
Cabal/Distribution/PackageDescription/Check.hs | 12 ++--
1 file
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:55:47PM +0200, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
I noticed another thing while perusing the source code: There seem to be
quite a few TODO comments scattered about.
Is there some sort of convention whereby it is permitted to add TODOs as
long as the person doing so
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 04:21:36PM -0500, Gershom B wrote:
> Sorry for the slow response time. I know you've been on this for a
> while. I've now committed those changes to master and they'll be in
> the next redeploy. Thanks!
Awesome!
many thanks Gershom
-F
17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francesco Ariis
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:48:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix estimator explanation
---
Distribution/Server/Features/Votes/State.hs | 2 +-
datafiles/templates/Html/package-page.html.st | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --
Hello everyone,
at today cabal-dev meeting we talked about the proposal of shifting the
fortnightly dev meeting by _one week_ [1], to accommodate more people (namely,
Emily).
Question:
- would anyone else be affected (more likely/unlikely to join the meeting)
with this date change?
[1] so
