Re: Gearing up for the 2.2 release

2017-12-27 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Daniel, On 27 December 2017 at 17:43, Daniel Trstenjak wrote: > Most likely the stability of the pretty printing of a > GenericPackageDescription > isn't considered that important. > > I just wanted to mention that the order of fields in the stanzas changed > from

Re: Gearing up for the 2.2 release

2017-12-27 Thread Daniel Trstenjak
Most likely the stability of the pretty printing of a GenericPackageDescription isn't considered that important. I just wanted to mention that the order of fields in the stanzas changed from 'Cabal 1.24/2.0' to the current HEAD. Greetings, Daniel name: setup-config version: 0.1 cabal-version:

Re: Gearing up for the 2.2 release

2017-12-27 Thread Oleg Grenrus
I had a good success with completing a lot of parser work around Christmas, still on my todo list are: - rewriting InstalledPackageInfo parser using new (parsec) framework, which is (soft) prerequisite to - changing license field to use SPDX expressions SPDX types are already merged, so there

Gearing up for the 2.2 release

2017-12-15 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi *, It is time to start planning for the 2.2 release of Cabal/cabal-install. The original plan was to do it before the end of the year, however, given the current state of HEAD and the fact that GHC 8.4 is going to be released in February, I think it won't be a tragedy if we delay 2.2 a little.