> On 4 Jun, 2016, at 04:01, Andrew McGregor wrote:
>
> There are undoubtedly DCTCP-like ECN responses widely deployed, since
> that is the default behaviour in Windows Server (gated on RTT in some
> versions). But also, ECN bleaching exists, as do servers with ECN
> response turned off even tho
There are undoubtedly DCTCP-like ECN responses widely deployed, since
that is the default behaviour in Windows Server (gated on RTT in some
versions). But also, ECN bleaching exists, as do servers with ECN
response turned off even though they negotiate ECN. It would be good
to know some specifics
> On 3 Jun, 2016, at 22:09, Noah Causin wrote:
>
> Was the issue, where the drops and marks did not seem to occur, resolved?
Examination of packet dumps obtained under controlled conditions showed that
marking and dropping *did* occur as normal, and I got a normal response from a
local machin
Was the issue, where the drops and marks did not seem to occur, resolved?
On 5/26/2016 8:33 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
On 24 May, 2016, at 18:52, Dave Täht wrote:
My last attempts with cake the way it was had it performing miserably at
longer RTTs (try 50ms) vs codel or fq-codel - as in half t
