Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100

2017-11-16 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 16/11/17 09:24, Pete Heist wrote: From: Dave Taht mailto:dave.t...@gmail.com>> To: Cake List > Subject: Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100 Message-ID: > Content-Type: te

Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection

2016-08-27 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 27/08/16 17:17, techic...@gmail.com wrote: Here you go: http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/share/9eeb4cf725e2ad98373e7f31c94c84f4.html ok. - Average latency is perfectly fine (for the points you mentioned) - Reading the docs for this tool ("How do I interpret my BQM graph?"), they suggest

Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection

2016-08-27 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 26/08/16 12:32, techic...@gmail.com wrote: So best to just leave well alone I think :) I do have one question. I sometimes use the thinkbroadband.com Ping Monitor and it shows my ping as being 40-50ms a lot of the time, even with cake. What's going on here? Meaning sometimes it's lower, I a

Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection

2016-08-27 Thread Alan Jenkins
be slightly worse. When someone else is uploading/downloading files at the same time. Or potentially when a computer is doing both in the background, because it gets software updates over P2P. Thanks so much for your help so far. On 26 August 2016 at 12:52, Alan Jenkins wrote: On 26/08/

Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection

2016-08-26 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 26/08/16 12:29, moeller0 wrote: Hi techicist, On Aug 26, 2016, at 13:15 , techic...@gmail.com wrote: Is flowblind likely to give better performance? That depends on your definition of better, I guess. Typically flow-fair queuing seems to be what most people prefer (unless an appli

Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection

2016-08-26 Thread Alan Jenkins
b-hanover/CeroWrtScripts On 24 August 2016 at 20:49, Alan Jenkins wrote: On 24/08/16 20:47, Alan Jenkins wrote: So you can read off (+calculate) overall throughput, in both directions. And it looks like your latency under load rises by only about 2ms. That's the sort of thing we&#

Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection

2016-08-24 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 24/08/16 20:47, Alan Jenkins wrote: So you can read off (+calculate) overall throughput, in both directions. And it looks like your latency under load rises by only about 2ms. That's the sort of thing we're aiming for. Pure codel aims for 5ms, so I take it you're using fq

Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection

2016-08-24 Thread Alan Jenkins
So you can read off (+calculate) overall throughput, in both directions. And it looks like your latency under load rises by only about 2ms. That's the sort of thing we're aiming for. Pure codel aims for 5ms, so I take it you're using fq_codel. And... yes (1500 * 8) / 4_000_000 = 0.003 It ta

Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection

2016-08-24 Thread Alan Jenkins
The RRUL graph shows 4 simultaneous flows. The total of 4 flows averaging 7Mb/s is 28Mb/s :). I think it's more obvious when you know what the legend means. The flows have different service markings (which may or may not have any effect). BE = "Best effort" (neither high nor low priority) BK

Re: [Cake] [Codel] Proposing COBALTLike the issues with streaming video, which are potentially addressed by the fq qdisc. I wonder how much it would help for torrents. (Avoiding bursting the entire co

2016-06-04 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 04/06/2016, Noah Causin wrote: > I notice that issue with Steam. Steam uses lots of ECN, which can be > nice for saving bandwidth with large games. The issue I notice is that > Steam is the one application that can cause me to have ping spikes of > over 100ms Am I right in thinking Steam use

Re: [Cake] new code point proposed

2016-04-07 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 06/04/16 21:39, Dave Taht wrote: this is still not the document I read (which was better), but this is what was just discussed. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-00 Dave Täht On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Dave Taht wrote: I note that somewhere along the line in

Re: [Cake] triple flow isolation

2016-01-18 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 18/01/2016, Jonathan Morton wrote: > Hence I think it’s reasonable to simply switch on triple isolation by > default, in the near future. It does approximately the right thing, without > further configuration, in the great majority of practical cases (that I can > think of), and to a greater