On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 17:00 +0100, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> >
> > The documentation doesn't match the code though.
>
> Since I did not see your original mail, only Toke's response, which
> documentation is wrong here?
Ah, I had missed that the docs were updated already on 6 Jan 2022.
On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 12:54 +0100, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
> LE(1) is tin 0 the lowest
> CS1(8) is 1 slightly above LE
> CS0/BE(0) is 2
> AF1x (10, 12, 14) are all in tin 1 as is CS1
...
> Just as documented in the code:
>
> *Bog Standard (CS0 etc.)
> *
The CS1 priority (index 0x08) was changed from 0 to 1 when LE (index
0x01) was added. This looks unintentional, it doesn't match the
docs and CS1 shouldn't be the same tin as AF1x
Signed-off-by: Matt Johnston
Fixes: b8392808eb3f ("sch_cake: add RFC 8622 LE PHB support to CAKE diffserv
han
