Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

In terms of disabling classification and always using best effort, always passing NULL here to the classifier will do the trick. http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/mac80211/wme.c#L218 At first glance it does not appear to have *any* default, which implies that rrul and rrul_be will be

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

Pete Heist writes: > On Feb 16, 2017, at 10:03 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2017, at 18:19, Jonathan Morton wrote: > > In a sense if there are thresholds for permissible VO/VI traffic fractions > below which the AP

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> On Feb 16, 2017, at 6:19 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote: > >> On 16 Feb, 2017, at 18:51, Pete Heist wrote: >> >> At first I was thinking to just remove diffserv markings entirely, say with >> Cake’s besteffort flag, but I think that “good” and

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> On 16 Feb, 2017, at 18:51, Pete Heist wrote: > > At first I was thinking to just remove diffserv markings entirely, say with > Cake’s besteffort flag, but I think that “good” and “otherwise unknowing” > users would suffer, which I think in FreeNet is a vast majority of

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> On Feb 16, 2017, at 17:15, Aaron Wood wrote: > > The approach that's in all of the Cisco documentation (FWIW) about such > things for wired networks is that the higher-priority traffic classes for > VoIP and video are also bandwidth limited to a fraction of the total (and

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

The approach that's in all of the Cisco documentation (FWIW) about such things for wired networks is that the higher-priority traffic classes for VoIP and video are also bandwidth limited to a fraction of the total (and less than a majority, at that). But that's in an environment where you

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> On Feb 16, 2017, at 9:42 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > >> On Feb 16, 2017, at 08:57, Pete Heist wrote: >> [… discussion about DSCP to WMM classes mapping] >> This always makes me wonder what’s to keep someone from just marking all >> their traffic 0x7

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> On Feb 16, 2017, at 08:57, Pete Heist wrote: > [… discussion about DSCP to WMM classes mapping] > This always makes me wonder what’s to keep someone from just marking all > their traffic 0x7 and stomping over everyone else. I have a gut feeling that an AP in a

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> On Feb 9, 2017, at 3:44 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Pete Heist writes: > >> I’ll mention one example I noticed of the kind of adjustment that >> probably can’t be done from the qdisc layer today. On page 3 from >>

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> On Feb 1, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Pete Heist > writes: > >> Few general points on running tests: >> >> - Yeah, as you note Flent has a batch facility. Did you not use this >> simply because you

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

Aaron Wood writes: > - Yeah, as you note Flent has a batch facility. Did you not use this >simply because you couldn't find it, or was there some other reason? >Would love some feedback on what I can do to make that more useful to >people... While I have no doubt

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

Pete Heist writes: > On Jan 30, 2017, at 10:44 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Oh my, this is quite a lot of tests. Nice :) > > It’s also a thumbs up for the ath9k driver changes that nothing went > wrong during the testing. It takes about 15 hours for

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> On Jan 31, 2017, at 12:55 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > > * Question #16: Is there any other testing anyone would like to see > while I have this rig up? > > 1) ECN on on both sides. > 2) A voip test > 3) P2MP (3 or more stations, rtt_fair_var* tests) > 4) Lowered MCS rates or

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> On Jan 31, 2017, at 12:21 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > > A backstory of how I got involved in the bufferbloat effort was that I > deployed some shiny "new" and "faster" wireless-n radios (6 years > ago)... and my WISP network in Nicaragua collapsed in rain - which was > about 6

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> On Jan 30, 2017, at 10:44 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Oh my, this is quite a lot of tests. Nice :) It’s also a thumbs up for the ath9k driver changes that nothing went wrong during the testing. It takes about 15 hours for a full run and I probably did that 4-5 times

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

* Question #16: Is there any other testing anyone would like to see while I have this rig up? Please! 1) ECN on on both sides. 2) A voip test 3) P2MP (3 or more stations, rtt_fair_var* tests) 4) Lowered MCS rates or distance or rain Of these, the last will improve the accuracy and relevance of

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

> - Yeah, as you note Flent has a batch facility. Did you not use this > simply because you couldn't find it, or was there some other reason? > Would love some feedback on what I can do to make that more useful to > people... While I have no doubt that your 'flenter.py' works, wrapping > a

Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] Flent results for point-to-point Wi-Fi on LEDE/OM2P-HS available

Pete Heist writes: > Hi, I’ve posted some Flent results and analysis for point-to-point Wi-Fi > using LEDE on OM2P-HS (ath9k): > > http://www.drhleny.cz/bufferbloat/wifi_bufferbloat.html Oh my, this is quite a lot of tests. Nice :) Few general points on running tests: -