Benjamin Cronce wrote:
I have not sampled YouTube data in a while, but the last time I looked it
had packet-pacing issues. With TCP going from idle to full, several times a
second. Not only do you get the issue that TCP will front-load the entire
TCP window all at once, but if the data being tra
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 19:02, Andy Furniss
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>>
Looking at tc-adv, I would recommend to use “rtt 50” (maybe it is
“rtt 50ms”) which allows to d
Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Feb 27, 2017, at 19:02, Andy Furniss
wrote:
Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Looking at tc-adv, I would recommend to use “rtt 50” (maybe it is
“rtt 50ms”) which allows to directly explicitly request a new
“interval” (which IIRC is corresponding to the time you a
Hi Andy,
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 19:02, Andy Furniss wrote:
>
> Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>> Looking at tc-adv, I would recommend to use “rtt 50” (maybe it is
>> “rtt 50ms”) which allows to directly explicitly request a new
>> “interval” (which IIRC is corresponding to the time you allow for
>> th
Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Looking at tc-adv, I would recommend to use “rtt 50” (maybe it is
“rtt 50ms”) which allows to directly explicitly request a new
“interval” (which IIRC is corresponding to the time you allow for
the TCP control loop to react to cake’s ecn-marking/dropping)
“target’ will be
Looking at tc-adv, I would recommend to use “rtt 50” (maybe it is “rtt 50ms”)
which allows to directly explicitly request a new “interval” (which IIRC is
corresponding to the time you allow for the TCP control loop to react to cake’s
ecn-marking/dropping) “target’ will be calculated as 5% of the
Jonathan Morton wrote:
On 26 Feb, 2017, at 15:16, Andy Furniss wrote:
Is there any way or plans to allow users to relax slightly the target?
You can do that by selecting a higher assumed RTT, for instance with the
“oceanic” or “satellite” keywords. This also increases the interval, which
> On 26 Feb, 2017, at 15:16, Andy Furniss wrote:
>
> Is there any way or plans to allow users to relax slightly the target?
You can do that by selecting a higher assumed RTT, for instance with the
“oceanic” or “satellite” keywords. This also increases the interval, which
makes the AQM less a
Hi, I am new to cake and just messing around currently.
I notice that on my setup with vdsl2 20mbit sync the default 5ms target
on best effort hurts netperf throughput a bit as latency to host rises.
My setup.
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 handle 1:0 root cake bandwidth 19690kbit raw
overhead 34 diffs
