Re: [Cake] Possible BUG - parent backlog incorrectly updated in case of NET_XMIT_CN

2016-06-12 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Sun, 2016-06-12 at 20:51 +0300, Jonathan Morton wrote: > > On 12 Jun, 2016, at 20:48, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > >> A) In my failing to make sense of all the dialog around these patches > >> ( https://lwn.net/Articles/687617/ ), it sounds like this (inbound > >> and

Re: [Cake] Possible BUG - parent backlog incorrectly updated in case of NET_XMIT_CN

2016-06-12 Thread Jonathan Morton
>> And there’s also the problem that we might not need to drop packets as >> large as the incoming packet in order to fit the latter into the queue >> - so this corrected correction may be *negative* (the queue is longer >> than before) - but qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog() only takes an unsigned >>

Re: [Cake] Possible BUG - parent backlog incorrectly updated in case of NET_XMIT_CN

2016-06-11 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
On 07/06/16 16:05, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: On 07/06/16 15:50, Jonathan Morton wrote: On 7 Jun, 2016, at 14:20, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: I had a nose at CAKE but couldn't quit work out if a similar issue is present but I suspect it is.

Re: [Cake] Possible BUG - parent backlog incorrectly updated in case of NET_XMIT_CN

2016-06-07 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
On 07/06/16 15:50, Jonathan Morton wrote: On 7 Jun, 2016, at 14:20, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: I had a nose at CAKE but couldn't quit work out if a similar issue is present but I suspect it is. Certainly if Eric can't get it right "My prior attempt to fix

Re: [Cake] Possible BUG - parent backlog incorrectly updated in case of NET_XMIT_CN

2016-06-07 Thread Jonathan Morton
> On 7 Jun, 2016, at 14:20, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant > wrote: > > I had a nose at CAKE but couldn't quit work out if a similar issue is present > but I suspect it is. Certainly if Eric can't get it right "My prior attempt > to fix the backlogs of parents