> On 19 Jul 2018, at 17:08, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Yeah, considered doing a backport patch to the kernel in openwrt. But I
> concluded it was not worth the trouble, since we already have a working
> module from the main repo.
I’m coming to a similar conclusion. The motivation came
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
> Hiya Chaps,
>
> Bet that subject woke you up!
>
> This is one for the back burner but I’d like to do it at some point,
> mainly ‘cos my name is in the maintainer field :-)
>
> Ideally I’d like to introduce cake as a kernel patch backport to
> openwrt instead of
> On 19 Jul, 2018, at 6:53 pm, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
> …the conditional conntrack has me beaten.
Given the focus of OpenWRT, it might be sane to just unconditionally depend on
conntrack in the backported version.
- Jonathan Morton
Hiya Chaps,
Bet that subject woke you up!
This is one for the back burner but I’d like to do it at some point, mainly
‘cos my name is in the maintainer field :-)
Ideally I’d like to introduce cake as a kernel patch backport to openwrt
instead of as an additional module. I’ve started out but
