Re: [Cake] options for shrinking cake xstats

2017-12-16 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Kevin, > On Dec 16, 2017, at 09:35, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant > wrote: > > This didn’t seem to generate any response so I’ll have a go :-) > >> On 6 Dec 2017, at 00:06, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> as 1400+ bytes on the parisc stack, is a bit much. That said, I don't >> see much possibility for

Re: [Cake] options for shrinking cake xstats

2017-12-16 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
This didn’t seem to generate any response so I’ll have a go :-) > On 6 Dec 2017, at 00:06, Dave Taht wrote: > > as 1400+ bytes on the parisc stack, is a bit much. That said, I don't > see much possibility for shrinkage overall. How much over do you happen to know? I see a number of options (6 o

[Cake] options for shrinking cake xstats

2017-12-05 Thread Dave Taht
as 1400+ bytes on the parisc stack, is a bit much. That said, I don't see much possibility for shrinkage overall. A) if we resort to having a struct new_cake_xstats[q->tin_cnt], we still end up with a big stack on the diffserv8 case (that won't get caught by a static checker) B) I'm on record as