Re: [Cake] COBALT implementation in ns-3 with results under different traffic scenarios

2018-11-23 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 8:05 AM Dave Taht wrote: > > Jendaipou Palmei writes: > > > Hi Dave, > > > > We have added the results for CoDel and PIE in the same setup. > > > > Link: > > https://github.com/Daipu/COBALT/wiki/Light-Traffic > > Wonderful, thank you. One new thing in cobalt is it

Re: [Cake] COBALT implementation in ns-3 with results under different traffic scenarios

2018-11-23 Thread Dave Taht
Jendaipou Palmei writes: > Hi Dave, > > We have added the results for CoDel and PIE in the same setup. > > Link: > https://github.com/Daipu/COBALT/wiki/Light-Traffic Wonderful, thank you. One new thing in cobalt is it responds much earlier to stuff in slow start, and thus that first spike is

Re: [Cake] COBALT implementation in ns-3 with results under different traffic scenarios

2018-11-23 Thread Jonathan Morton
> On 23 Nov, 2018, at 6:43 pm, Dave Taht wrote: > > This is possibly a correct result in your simulation!! - the periodic > throughput drop you are showing in cobalt at this bandwidth and rtt. > I'm happy to see cobalt kick in early on slow start but not happy to > see the periodic drop. Jon, do

Re: [Cake] COBALT implementation in ns-3 with results under different traffic scenarios

2018-11-23 Thread Jendaipou Palmei
Hi Dave, We have added the results for CoDel and PIE in the same setup. Link: https://github.com/Daipu/COBALT/wiki/Light-Traffic Thanks for your help. On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 9:02 PM Dave Taht wrote: > Your light traffic graph is puzzling, with the synchronized drops. Is > it possible for

Re: [Cake] COBALT implementation in ns-3 with results under different traffic scenarios

2018-11-23 Thread Jonathan Morton
>> This is possibly a correct result in your simulation!! - the periodic >> throughput drop you are showing in cobalt at this bandwidth and rtt. >> I'm happy to see cobalt kick in early on slow start but not happy to >> see the periodic drop. Jon, do you have time for a code review? > > I looked