Re: [Cake] de-natting & host fairness

2016-09-25 Thread Dave Taht
I have to admit my end-state was: tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress cake bandwidth 100mbit. ___ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] de-natting & host fairness

2016-09-25 Thread Dave Taht
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > Greetings! > > A while back I started on a quest to make cake 'nat' aware as the lack of > host fairness in a typical home router environment was the only thing that > prevented cake from being the ultimate qdisc in my opinion. Thi

[Cake] de-natting & host fairness

2016-09-25 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Greetings! A while back I started on a quest to make cake 'nat' aware as the lack of host fairness in a typical home router environment was the only thing that prevented cake from being the ultimate qdisc in my opinion. This involves dealing with conntrack which on egress is easy (the kernel

[Cake] cake for net-next 4.8

2016-09-25 Thread Dave Taht
I quickly got sch_cake to work on top of net next. The attached diff is probably not correct in some respect or another (what's to_free for? And it looks like statistics collection has been parallelized elsewhere) ... but I did not crash my box in an hour of trying, with it. Judging from me teari