Shouldn't unresponsive UDP flows be punished for sending too many packets?
In that case if there's any problem at all it is that the packets get
through with 20 seconds delay instead of being dropped entirely. Although
it shouldn't really matter either way as long as other flows are not
unfairly im
> Fra: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
>
> Right, so you're measuring the actual latency experienced by the UDP packets
> in the
> unresponsive flow? Yeah, you'll get quite a bit of latency in that case. But
> not sure that's a case
> we should be optimising for...
That was just the worst case scenari
On 5 May 2017 16:30:38 GMT+02:00, erik.tarald...@telenor.com wrote:
>
>> Den 5. mai 2017 kl. 15.59 skrev Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
>:
>>
>> How are you measuring latency in this case?
>
>I use nuttcp with the option -o. It uses system time on the two peers.
>Make sure they are recently synced to th
> Den 5. mai 2017 kl. 15.59 skrev Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :
>
> How are you measuring latency in this case?
I use nuttcp with the option -o. It uses system time on the two peers. Make
sure they are recently synced to the same ntp server. And do an uncongested
test to establish actual network ti
Hi Erik,
> On May 5, 2017, at 15:55, erik.tarald...@telenor.com wrote:
>
>> Fra: Sebastian Moeller
>
>> .. snip
>> One problem with the unelastic load is that as far as I can tell no flow on
>> the open internet is
>> allows/assumed to behave like that (isn’t the default tcp-friendly, and
writes:
>> Fra: Sebastian Moeller
>
>> .. snip
>> One problem with the unelastic load is that as far as I can tell no flow on
>> the open internet is
>> allows/assumed to behave like that (isn’t the default tcp-friendly, and
>> inelastic DOS traffic is
>> essentially out-lawed?)
>
> You ar
> Fra: Sebastian Moeller
> .. snip
> One problem with the unelastic load is that as far as I can tell no flow on
> the open internet is
> allows/assumed to behave like that (isn’t the default tcp-friendly, and
> inelastic DOS traffic is
> essentially out-lawed?)
You are right in that singl
writes:
> Just a follow-up from the great support I got here. I am now running ER-X
> with cake with the precompiled binaries from Nils. I need to do some tuning
> and get it properly into the lab. Currently I'm dogfooding it at home.
>
> Any other suggestions in order to make the topping of
Hi Erik,
> On May 5, 2017, at 15:00,
> wrote:
>
> Just a follow-up from the great support I got here. I am now running ER-X
> with cake with the precompiled binaries from Nils. I need to do some tuning
> and get it properly into the lab. Currently I'm dogfooding it at home.
>
>
> Any o
Just a follow-up from the great support I got here. I am now running ER-X with
cake with the precompiled binaries from Nils. I need to do some tuning and get
it properly into the lab. Currently I'm dogfooding it at home.
Any other suggestions in order to make the topping of the cake so to sp
10 matches
Mail list logo
