https://seekingalpha.com/article/4127448-cobalt-cliff-two-dire-warnings-musk-soliloquy?page=2
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/lis
awesome.
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 8:38 PM, wrote:
> I am currently testing latest net-next with both sch_cake and
> nf_conntrack compiled as integrals (Y instead of M). So far it works as
> expected (previous build was 4.9.64, sch_cake out-of-tree, and
> nf_conntrack as module).
>
> Are there any
I am currently testing latest net-next with both sch_cake and
nf_conntrack compiled as integrals (Y instead of M). So far it works as
expected (previous build was 4.9.64, sch_cake out-of-tree, and
nf_conntrack as module).
Are there any specific tests you would like me to run?
I am attaching the p
Just finished building, setting both sch_cake and nf_conntrack as
integral succeeds. Setting nf_conntrack as module fails with sch_cake
as integral (makes sense).
I am remote right now and cannot test the newly built kernel, hopefully
I will get it done tonight.
George
On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 17:0
I am giving it another try. nf_conntrack was built as a module. I am
rebuilding on a clean dir, nf_conntrack set as integral this time. Will
report soon.
George
On 11/25/2017 8:00 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
I just got back from town and pushed a version that builds into the
for_upstream_4.16 branc
I just got back from town and pushed a version that builds into the
for_upstream_4.16 branch, with kevins latest.
Trying another build here, with "m", takes hours. thx for trying 'y'!
As for what's going wrong... is nf_conntrack being built? as a module
? as integral? We've always built cake and
grep'ing in net-next for nf_ct_get_tuplepr reveals these are still in use.
On 11/25/2017 7:49 PM, George Amanakis wrote:
I tried Kevin's latest commit, now it fails with:
CHK include/config/kernel.release
CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
DESCEND objtool
CHK inclu
I tried Kevin's latest commit, now it fails with:
CHK include/config/kernel.release
CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
DESCEND objtool
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
CHK scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.h
CHK include/generated/bounds.h
CHK include
https://github.com/dtaht/sch_cake/pull/74
Once again, sorry about the screwup.
> On 25 Nov 2017, at 20:49, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
> [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear
> to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]
>
>
Ooops, sorry, dodge merge on my part from my work tree back to cobalt. A fix &
PR will be with you shortly…. apologies.
Kevin
> On 25 Nov 2017, at 20:03, George Amanakis wrote:
>
> I think we missed an "allocate_host" in cake_hash(), line ~810:
>
> if (allocate_host) {
> srchost_
I think we missed an "allocate_host" in cake_hash(), line ~810:
if (allocate_host) {
srchost_idx = srchost_hash % CAKE_QUEUES;
inner_hash = srchost_idx % CAKE_SET_WAYS;
outer_hash = srchost_idx - inner_hash;
for (i = 0, k = inner_hash; i < CAKE_SET_
Gotos are fairly common in kernel code, chiefly for exception handling.
Obviously structured code is still preferred where it makes sense, but
there are cases where it would actually confuse matters.
I hope to be able to spend most of tomorrow going over the code as it
currently stands. I even ha
> On Nov 25, 2017, at 5:48 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> I am unfond of the gotos as well. But I'm gonna go do laundry. :) If
> someone else beats me to it?
To me the very occasional goto can be nice as an intellectual mint on your
pillow- ooh, I didn’t expect to find that there, kind of thing. See
I fired off a build of this with the changes to allocate_src/dst that kevin
just committed... which will take long enough for me to do laundry.
Hopefully. Regardless, I'm out of action for 3 hrs.
I'd certainly love it if others integrated this against net-next and
tried it. In particular nobody (i
> On 25 Nov 2017, at 16:41, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> Not quite. The "dual" enums have more than one bit set, so you have to test
> them for equality.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
Here you go
https://github.com/ldir-EDB0/sch_cake/commit/795db1d1df9f9a400d8c4861eeff59b85994ccfb
- rebased onto c
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Please ignore that patchset. I'll regenerate it later.
The tarball, anyway. (I'd generated it before I ripped out perturb)
The branch looks ok to my bleeding eyes thus far.
>
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> I have a for
Please ignore that patchset. I'll regenerate it later.
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I have a for_upstream_4.16 branch which you might want to pull and
> take a look at.
>
> It no longer compiles out of tree, so you can apply it against the
> current net-next kernel, with pa
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Pete Heist wrote:
>
>> On Nov 25, 2017, at 3:08 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 25 Nov 2017, at 03:59, Dave Taht wrote:
>>>
>>> there is no place in the current code base where these are not both
>>> true or both false. Thus redundant.
>>>
>>> ?
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
wrote:
>
>
>> On 25 Nov 2017, at 16:41, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>>
>> Not quite. The "dual" enums have more than one bit set, so you have to test
>> them for equality.
>>
>> - Jonathan Morton
>
> Oh dammit, yes they are dual bit flags, rat
I have a for_upstream_4.16 branch which you might want to pull and
take a look at.
It no longer compiles out of tree, so you can apply it against the
current net-next kernel, with patchset for that is attached. I'm
compiling this version now (which takes a while), and going out to do
laundry.
up
> On 25 Nov 2017, at 16:41, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> Not quite. The "dual" enums have more than one bit set, so you have to test
> them for equality.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
Oh dammit, yes they are dual bit flags, rats. good catch. v2 shortly he he
:-)
__
Not quite. The "dual" enums have more than one bit set, so you have to
test them for equality.
- Jonathan Morton
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
> On 25 Nov 2017, at 15:19, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> I think I originally intended to make them individually conditional on the
> src/dest host flags, but that idea evidently got forgotten.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
Ahh, is this
https://github.com/ldir-EDB0/sch_cake/commit/53953e073e26c45ac67
Part of making an upstream patch involves collapsing those ifdefs to match
the current kernel version. That by itself should considerably simplify
that function.
- Jonathan Morton
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloa
> On Nov 25, 2017, at 3:08 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
>> On 25 Nov 2017, at 03:59, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> there is no place in the current code base where these are not both
>> true or both false. Thus redundant.
>>
>> ?
>
> Yes, interesting that. Been there since introduced in
I think I originally intended to make them individually conditional on the
src/dest host flags, but that idea evidently got forgotten.
- Jonathan Morton
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
there is a bunch of activity restructuring iproute2... this last
patchset, for json.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 6:48 AM
Subject: [patch iproute2 00/11] tc: jsonify couple of qdics, filter and actions
To: net...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: step...@
> On 25 Nov 2017, at 03:59, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> there is no place in the current code base where these are not both
> true or both false. Thus redundant.
>
> ?
Yes, interesting that. Been there since introduced in 5a6da2ba Add
triple-isolation support. *EXPERIMENTAL*
Have done a PR https
28 matches
Mail list logo
