Re: [Cake] overhead for double nat VDSL2 connection

Hi Kevin, hi Mark, Kevin is 100% right! > On Dec 17, 2017, at 20:23, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant > wrote: > > > >> On 17 Dec 2017, at 15:23, Sebastian Moeller wrote: >> >> Hi Mark, >> >>> On Dec 17, 2017, at 11:45, Mark Captur

Re: [Cake] overhead for double nat VDSL2 connection

> On 17 Dec 2017, at 15:23, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > > Hi Mark, > >> On Dec 17, 2017, at 11:45, Mark Captur wrote: >> >> My setup is as follows >> >> vdsl2 modem doing pppoe itself and nat to 10.x.x.x -> lede master eth0.2 >> (wan static ip in

Re: [Cake] overhead for double nat VDSL2 connection

Thanks for the comprehensive and quick reply :) below are some further answers On 17 December 2017 at 16:23, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > On Dec 17, 2017, at 11:45, Mark Captur wrote: > > > > My setup is as follows > > > > vdsl2 modem doing

Re: [Cake] overhead for double nat VDSL2 connection

Hi Mark, > On Dec 17, 2017, at 11:45, Mark Captur wrote: > > My setup is as follows > > vdsl2 modem doing pppoe itself and nat to 10.x.x.x -> lede master eth0.2 (wan > static ip in modem's DMZ) eth0.1 (lan) doing nat to 192.168.1.x > > Here is my current SQM config >

[Cake] overhead for double nat VDSL2 connection

My setup is as follows vdsl2 modem doing pppoe itself and nat to 10.x.x.x -> lede master eth0.2 (wan static ip in modem's DMZ) eth0.1 (lan) doing nat to 192.168.1.x Here is my current SQM config config queue 'eth1' option debug_logging '0' option verbosity '5' option