From: gamanakis
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis
---
sch_cake.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sch_cake.c b/sch_cake.c
index 9f2acb5..22197e0 100644
--- a/sch_cake.c
+++ b/sch_cake.c
@@ -2364,7 +2364,12 @@ static void cake_reconfigure(struct
Georgios Amanakis writes:
> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 12, 0)
> err = nla_parse_nested(tb, TCA_CAKE_MAX, opt, cake_policy);
> -#else
> +#elif LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 16, 0)
> err = nla_parse_nested(tb, TCA_CAKE_MAX, opt, cake_policy, NULL);
> +#else
> +
-- Forwarded message --
From: Georgios Amanakis
Date: Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Cake] Compiling under net-next
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> Ah, wait, nla_parse_nested() takes an extack parameter now, so we should
> pass that through in cake_change() after this
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
> George Amanakis writes:
>
>> It seems the change was introduced here:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9671147/
>>
>> I drafted the following very simplistic patch, could somebody take a
>> look at it?
>
> LGTM. We may want to actually use the extack feature
George Amanakis writes:
> It seems the change was introduced here:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9671147/
>
> I drafted the following very simplistic patch, could somebody take a
> look at it?
LGTM. We may want to actually use the extack feature at some point, but
we're not really returni
