When splitting a GSO segment that consists of encapsulated packets, the
skb->mac_len of the segments can end up being set wrong, causing packet
drops in particular when using act_mirred and ifb interfaces in
combination with a qdisc that splits GSO packets.
This happens because at the time
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:45 AM Pete Heist wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:28 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, good point, I left nat there because I had one port configured for
> routing and the other for the bridge and was sometimes swapping between the
> two. I realize now I
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:28 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, good point, I left nat there because I had one port configured for
>> routing and the other for the bridge and was sometimes swapping between the
>> two. I realize now I actually sent the numbers for routing, not bridging.
Next time I have sufficient spare brain cells I would like to try
shaping across cores. I don't know how to
share a bit of data between qdiscs as yet, so my plan to prove it out,
is to use a static variable for time_next_packet (has to be 32 bits
also), and atomically update it between the
that was me shaping at 900.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:27 AM Pete Heist wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 11, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> >
> > What I "fixed" was on the apu2 with the burst/cburst change, I went
> > from completely bottlenecked on one softirq to having 3 eat cpu, and
> > from
Hi Pete,
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 20:09, Pete Heist wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:54 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>>
>>> So this has turned info an interesting exercise that produced a result
>>> counter to what the common wisdom has been (that fq_codel is “faster” than
>>> cake
>>
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> What I "fixed" was on the apu2 with the burst/cburst change, I went
> from completely bottlenecked on one softirq to having 3 eat cpu, and
> from 400mbps to 900mbps. Now, that's a quad core and the e1000 (?)
> driver. The edgerouter X is a
Hi Dave,
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 10:30, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 1:20 AM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 10:20, Dave Taht wrote:
>>>
>>> What I "fixed" was on the apu2 with the burst/cburst change, I went
>>> from completely
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 1:20 AM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> > On Sep 11, 2018, at 10:20, Dave Taht wrote:
> >
> > What I "fixed" was on the apu2 with the burst/cburst change, I went
> > from completely bottlenecked on one softirq to having 3 eat cpu, and
> > from 400mbps to
Hi Dave,
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 10:20, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> What I "fixed" was on the apu2 with the burst/cburst change, I went
> from completely bottlenecked on one softirq to having 3 eat cpu, and
> from 400mbps to 900mbps. Now, that's a quad core and the e1000 (?)
> driver. The edgerouter X
What I "fixed" was on the apu2 with the burst/cburst change, I went
from completely bottlenecked on one softirq to having 3 eat cpu, and
from 400mbps to 900mbps. Now, that's a quad core and the e1000 (?)
driver. The edgerouter X is a dual core, and you did see a small
improvement in throughput,
Hi Pete,
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 00:40, Pete Heist wrote:
>
> Subject changed from “Cake on elements of a bridge”...
>
> On Sep 10, 2018, at 9:55 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 12:29 PM Pete Heist wrote:
>>>
>>> For anyone who followed this, yes, the regular soft bridge
12 matches
Mail list logo
