Jonathan Morton writes:
>>> Yes, exactly. Would be interesting to hear what Jonathan, Toke and
>>> others think. I want to see if fairness is preserved in this case with
>>> sparse flows only. Could flent do this?
>>
>> Well, sparse flows are (by definition) not building a queue, so it
>>
Sebastian Moeller writes:
> Hi Toke,
>
>> On Jan 18, 2019, at 14:33, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> Georgios Amanakis writes:
>>
>>> Yes, exactly. Would be interesting to hear what Jonathan, Toke and
>>> others think. I want to see if fairness is preserved in this case with
>>> sparse
>> Yes, exactly. Would be interesting to hear what Jonathan, Toke and
>> others think. I want to see if fairness is preserved in this case with
>> sparse flows only. Could flent do this?
>
> Well, sparse flows are (by definition) not building a queue, so it
> doesn't really make sense to talk
Hi Toke,
> On Jan 18, 2019, at 14:33, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Georgios Amanakis writes:
>
>> Yes, exactly. Would be interesting to hear what Jonathan, Toke and
>> others think. I want to see if fairness is preserved in this case with
>> sparse flows only. Could flent do this?
>
>
Georgios Amanakis writes:
> Yes, exactly. Would be interesting to hear what Jonathan, Toke and
> others think. I want to see if fairness is preserved in this case with
> sparse flows only. Could flent do this?
Well, sparse flows are (by definition) not building a queue, so it
doesn't really
Yes, exactly. Would be interesting to hear what Jonathan, Toke and others
think. I want to see if fairness is preserved in this case with sparse
flows only. Could flent do this?
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, 5:07 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen George Amanakis writes:
>
> > A better version of the patch for
George Amanakis writes:
> A better version of the patch for testing.
So basically, you're changing the host fairness algorithm to only
consider bulk flows instead of all active flows to that host, right?
Seems reasonable to me. Jonathan, any opinion?
-Toke
