Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] [Bloat] dslreports is no longer free

2020-05-02 Thread Benjamin Cronce
> Fast.com reports my unloaded latency as 4ms, my loaded latency as ~7ms For download, I show 6ms unloaded and 6-7 loaded. But for upload the loaded shows as 7-8 and I see it blip upwards of 12ms. But I am no longer using any traffic shaping. Any anti-bufferbloat is from my ISP. A graph of the

Re: [Cake] inbound cake or fq_codel shaping fails on cable on netflix reno

2018-07-23 Thread Benjamin Cronce
I don't know if this is possible for higher density cities, but the fiber ISP here uses P2P fiber ring from the house all the way back to the CO. It's only at the CO that they aggregate to the GPON port. This means I do not share any field fiber with anyone else and the ring design allows for a

Re: [Cake] Fast snack, QUIC CAKE?

2017-08-10 Thread Benjamin Cronce
CAKE only works for endpoints you control. QUIC can benefit in situations where you don't control the chokepoints. Not sure how QUIC interacts with CAKE. I can't see it being more than a small percent better or worse. On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:36 AM, wrote: > Has

Re: [Cake] Getting Cake to work better with Steam and similar applications

2017-04-25 Thread Benjamin Cronce
What's your RTT(ping) to the different services, like Steam and Windows Update? Some ISPs have local CDNs that can give incredibly low latency relative to the provisioned bandwidth, which can cause bad things to happen with TCP. On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Dendari Marini

Re: [Cake] [LEDE-DEV] Cake SQM killing my DIR-860L - was: [17.01] Kernel: bump to 4.4.51

2017-03-06 Thread Benjamin Cronce
. On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 6 Mar, 2017, at 15:30, Benjamin Cronce <bcro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > You could treat it like task stealing, except each core can generate > tokens that represent a quant

Re: [Cake] upstreaming cake in 2017?

2016-12-24 Thread Benjamin Cronce
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote: > >> As far as Diffserv is concerned, I explicitly assume that the standard > RFC-defined DSCPs and PHBs are in use, which obviates any concerns about > Diffserv policy boundaries. > > > > ??? This comes close

Re: [Cake] New to cake. Some questions

2016-06-10 Thread Benjamin Cronce
At least you ISP's trunk seems decent ping -t 109.90.28.1 Packets: sent=150, rcvd=150, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 74.660177 sec RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 158.255 / 159.140 / 161.922 / 0.528 Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.120, rcvd=0.120 On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Dennis Fedtke