> Fast.com reports my unloaded latency as 4ms, my loaded latency as ~7ms
For download, I show 6ms unloaded and 6-7 loaded. But for upload the loaded
shows as 7-8 and I see it blip upwards of 12ms. But I am no longer using
any traffic shaping. Any anti-bufferbloat is from my ISP. A graph of the
I don't know if this is possible for higher density cities, but the fiber
ISP here uses P2P fiber ring from the house all the way back to the CO.
It's only at the CO that they aggregate to the GPON port. This means I do
not share any field fiber with anyone else and the ring design allows for a
CAKE only works for endpoints you control. QUIC can benefit in situations
where you don't control the chokepoints. Not sure how QUIC interacts with
CAKE. I can't see it being more than a small percent better or worse.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:36 AM, wrote:
> Has
What's your RTT(ping) to the different services, like Steam and Windows
Update? Some ISPs have local CDNs that can give incredibly low latency
relative to the provisioned bandwidth, which can cause bad things to happen
with TCP.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Dendari Marini
.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > On 6 Mar, 2017, at 15:30, Benjamin Cronce <bcro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > You could treat it like task stealing, except each core can generate
> tokens that represent a quant
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Jonathan Morton
wrote:
> >> As far as Diffserv is concerned, I explicitly assume that the standard
> RFC-defined DSCPs and PHBs are in use, which obviates any concerns about
> Diffserv policy boundaries.
> >
> > ??? This comes close
At least you ISP's trunk seems decent
ping -t 109.90.28.1
Packets: sent=150, rcvd=150, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 74.660177 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 158.255 / 159.140 / 161.922 / 0.528
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.120, rcvd=0.120
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Dennis Fedtke