Re: [Cake] WireGuard Queuing, Bufferbloat, Performance, Latency, and related issues

On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > You don't need a timer. You already have a signal for when more queue > space is available in the encryption step: When a packet finishes > encryption. All you need to do is try to enqueue another one at this > point.

Re: [Cake] WireGuard Queuing, Bufferbloat, Performance, Latency, and related issues

Hey Toke, On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > I assumed that there probably was, but was not sure where. Thanks for > clearing this up. I'll take a step back and try to describe this on the > conceptual level: Conceptual overview: exactly what I needed,

Re: [Cake] WireGuard Queuing, Bufferbloat, Performance, Latency, and related issues

Hey Toke & Dave, Thanks a lot for your responses. This is steering me in the right direction (I hope!). Responses are inline below. Regards, Jason On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Looking at your queueing structure description, I'd say the reusable