Re: [Cake] Per-host fairness

Hi Georgios, > On Oct 18, 2016, at 03:33 , Georgios Amanakis wrote: > > I tried with "besteffort dual-dsthost nat" on ifb ingress and > “besteffort dual-srchost nat" on WAN egress, Thanks. > and when doing simple > things (i.e. downloading from a couple of

Re: [Cake] diffserv based on firewall mark

robably is something most home-users will see occasionally. Best Regards Sebastian > > 2016年10月12日 下午8:04，"moeller0" <moell...@gmx.de>寫道： > Hi Ching? > > > On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:17 , ching lu <lschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [Cake] diffserv based on firewall mark

Hi Ching? > On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:17 , ching lu <lschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2016年10月12日 下午6:05，"moeller0" <moell...@gmx.de>寫道： > > > > Hi Ching, > > > > > On Oct 12, 2016, at 11:35 , ching lu <lschin...@gmail.com> wr

Re: [Cake] Master branch updated

Hi Jonathan, > On Oct 4, 2016, at 13:18 , Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 4 Oct, 2016, at 11:46, moeller0 <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> About that PTM accounting, could you explain why you want to perform the >> adjustm

Re: [Cake] de-natting & host fairness

Hi Jonathan, > On Sep 26, 2016, at 16:30 , Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 26 Sep, 2016, at 16:28, moeller0 <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> Does that mean an initial packet(s) for a flow will be “misclassified” (not >&g

Re: [Cake] de-natting & host fairness

Hi Kevin, this is like the missing puzzle piece, if you solved this, most home users might end up deep in your debt (without them realizing it of course). Question, if I enable this on my link how will it deal with the typical differences between IPv4 and IPv6? I believe that the situation I

Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection

Hi techicist, > On Aug 26, 2016, at 13:15 , techic...@gmail.com wrote: > > Is flowblind likely to give better performance? That depends on your definition of better, I guess. Typically flow-fair queuing seems to be what most people prefer (unless an application either does not respond

Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection

Hi techicist, > On Aug 23, 2016, at 15:44 , techic...@gmail.com wrote: > > I am using a TalkTalk (UK) VDSL2 connection via bridged PTM to my TP-LINK > Archer C7 V2. I am running LEDE. > > TalkTalk uses DHCP to obtain an IP address and not DHCP as most other ISPs do. I take it that

Re: [Cake] fq_codel on 3g network in Mauritius

Hi Loganaden, > On Jul 24, 2016, at 19:13 , Loganaden Velvindron <logana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:40 PM, moeller0 <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: >> Hi Jonathan, >> >>> On Jul 24, 2016, at 13:28 , Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gma

Re: [Cake] fq_codel on 3g network in Mauritius

Hi Loganaden, this is exactly the right idea; interval basically defines the “reaction time” window, or the time the endpoints of a connection minimally require to actually react to the drop/mark signal. So on a slow link with RTTs in the order of 300ms set interval to 300ms. Target should be

Re: [Cake] conntrack and ipv6

Hi Dave, > On Jul 2, 2016, at 14:47 , Dave Täht wrote: > > It is generally my hope that ipv6 nat will not be widely deployed. > > Firewalls will be stateful instead, and thus there would be no need to > access the conntrack information for ipv6 in cake. I would hope

Re: [Cake] New to cake. Some questions

any… Best Regards Sebastian > > Thanks :) > > > Am 10.06.2016 um 07:20 schrieb moeller0: >> Hi Dennis, >> >> >>> On Jun 10, 2016, at 02:49 , Dennis Fedtke <dennisfed...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sebastian, >>

Re: [Cake] New to cake. Some questions

the IP header: 42 bytes > > Can the errors be ignored ? I have never seen these before, so I need to see whether I can recreate them, which octave version are you using? Best Regards Sebastian > > Best Regards > Dennis > > > Am 10.06.2016 um 01:

Re: [Cake] CAKE upstream in LEDE

Hi Dave, > On Jun 7, 2016, at 18:07 , Dave Taht wrote: > > shiny! I could not resist and installed lede head on my 1200ac just now. > > But: > > root@linksys-1200ac:/etc/config# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root cake bandwidth > 9mbit > Unknown qdisc "cake", hence option

Re: [Cake] [Codel] Proposing COBALT

Hi Jonathan, > On Jun 4, 2016, at 16:16 , Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 4 Jun, 2016, at 17:01, moeller0 <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> Maybe cake should allow to switch from the default mark by ECN policy to >> mar

Re: [Cake] [Codel] Proposing COBALT

Hi Jonathan, > On Jun 4, 2016, at 15:55 , Jonathan Morton wrote: > > >> On 4 Jun, 2016, at 04:01, Andrew McGregor wrote: >> >> ...servers with ECN response turned off even though they negotiate ECN. > > It appears that I’m looking at precisely

Re: [Cake] cake/tc - removal of atm/ptm/ethernet specific overhead keywords

> On Jun 2, 2016, at 20:55 , Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 2 Jun, 2016, at 21:53, moeller0 <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> “conservative”-keyword needs special care in documentation as it is the only >> keyword that compo

Re: [Cake] Proposing COBALT

> On May 20, 2016, at 15:41 , David Lang wrote: > > On Fri, 20 May 2016, Jonathan Morton wrote: > >> Normal traffic does not include large numbers of fragmented packets (I would >> expect a mere handful from certain one-shot request-response protocols which >> can produce

Re: [Cake] new code point proposed

> On Apr 5, 2016, at 22:06 , Jonathan Morton wrote: > > >> On 5 Apr, 2016, at 21:57, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-you-tsvwg-latency-loss-tradeoff-00 > > Interesting. This is obviously written around the DualQ AQM, but

Re: [Cake] cake separate qos for lan

> limits purchased by the customer. Ah, you are right, I have not fully thought through your requirements then. I am quite curios to learn how this will work out ;) Especially since you will need to run (100 to 2000) * 2 cake instances on the router if you go for a “two shaper p

Re: [Cake] cake separate qos for lan

Hi Allan, > On Mar 27, 2016, at 07:31 , Allan Pinto wrote: > > > Is the cache inside or outside the point where the router is fitted > outside.. > > Cache-Server >| > internet Gateway —> L2 switch --> LInux router with cake - - [ pppoe > connection ] -->

Re: [Cake] triple flow isolation

Hi Kevin, > On Jan 11, 2016, at 21:33 , Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant > <ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote: > > > > On 11/01/16 18:16, moeller0 wrote: >> Hi Kevin, >> >> I agree the triple mode seems under-documented ;) > Yes that's true but it is e

Re: [Cake] triple flow isolation

Hi Kevin, I agree the triple mode seems under-documented ;) > On Jan 11, 2016, at 18:40 , Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant > wrote: > > Hello List, > > I've been looking at latest 'triple flow isolation' features in latest > cake git and find myself confused. It's very