--- Begin Message ---
Hi.
I cant. then I adjust fq_codel.
ty :)
yutaka
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:39:12 +0300
Jonathan Morton wrote:
> > qdisc cake 8002: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit
> > (?diffserv?)
>
> This suggests that the kernel is in a Diffserv mode that
> qdisc cake 8002: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit (?diffserv?)
This suggests that the kernel is in a Diffserv mode that the userspace tc
version doesn't understand. Since Toke has just been fiddling with that, you
should ensure you update and recompile *both* the kernel module and
--- Begin Message ---
Hi.
I did and reboot.
but this.
yutaka
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ tc -d -s qdisc
qdisc noqueue 0: dev lo root refcnt 2
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc cake 8002: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit (?diffserv?)
srchost
Y via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> writes:
> From: Y <intruder_t...@yahoo.fr>
> Subject: Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode
> To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 21:40:48 +0900
>
> Hi.
>
> mine stat doen't inclued more.
> sad.
Di
Pete Heist writes:
>> On Apr 21, 2018, at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>>>
>>> Improved intra-flow latency could be useful for HTTP/2 or other things, but
>>> I don’t see how the current llt mode helps most ordinary people with that,
>>> when it
> On Apr 21, 2018, at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>>
>> Improved intra-flow latency could be useful for HTTP/2 or other things, but
>> I don’t see how the current llt mode helps most ordinary people with that,
>> when it would only apply to flows with certain
>> Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting?
>
> I re-tested diffserv-llt quickly using the current head of cake and tc-adv
> and am confused by something:
>
> http://drhleny.cz/bufferbloat/cake/round5/diffserv_rrul_eg_cake_ds-llt_50mbit/index.html
>
> When I look at the qdisc stats
--- Begin Message ---
Hi.
mine stat doen't inclued more.
sad.
yutaka
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ tc -s -d qdisc
qdisc noqueue 0: dev lo root refcnt 2
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc cake 8017: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit diffserv3
> On Apr 19, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting?
I re-tested diffserv-llt quickly using the current head of cake and tc-adv and
am confused by something:
kill it.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
>
>> Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? The draft describing
>> it seems to have expired ages ago:
>>
>>
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
> Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? The draft describing
> it seems to have expired ages ago:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-tsvwg-latency-loss-tradeoff/
Also, adding to the diffserv thing, right now there seems to be
Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? The draft describing
it seems to have expired ages ago:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-tsvwg-latency-loss-tradeoff/
-Toke
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
12 matches
Mail list logo