Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-22 Thread Y via Cake
--- Begin Message --- Hi. I cant. then I adjust fq_codel. ty :) yutaka On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:39:12 +0300 Jonathan Morton wrote: > > qdisc cake 8002: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit > > (?diffserv?) > > This suggests that the kernel is in a Diffserv mode that

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-22 Thread Jonathan Morton
> qdisc cake 8002: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit (?diffserv?) This suggests that the kernel is in a Diffserv mode that the userspace tc version doesn't understand. Since Toke has just been fiddling with that, you should ensure you update and recompile *both* the kernel module and

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-22 Thread Y via Cake
--- Begin Message --- Hi. I did and reboot. but this. yutaka pi@raspberrypi:~ $ tc -d -s qdisc qdisc noqueue 0: dev lo root refcnt 2 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 qdisc cake 8002: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit (?diffserv?) srchost

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-22 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Y via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> writes: > From: Y <intruder_t...@yahoo.fr> > Subject: Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode > To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 21:40:48 +0900 > > Hi. > > mine stat doen't inclued more. > sad. Di

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-22 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Pete Heist writes: >> On Apr 21, 2018, at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote: >>> >>> Improved intra-flow latency could be useful for HTTP/2 or other things, but >>> I don’t see how the current llt mode helps most ordinary people with that, >>> when it

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-22 Thread Pete Heist
> On Apr 21, 2018, at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote: >> >> Improved intra-flow latency could be useful for HTTP/2 or other things, but >> I don’t see how the current llt mode helps most ordinary people with that, >> when it would only apply to flows with certain

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-21 Thread Jonathan Morton
>> Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? > > I re-tested diffserv-llt quickly using the current head of cake and tc-adv > and am confused by something: > > http://drhleny.cz/bufferbloat/cake/round5/diffserv_rrul_eg_cake_ds-llt_50mbit/index.html > > When I look at the qdisc stats

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-21 Thread Y via Cake
--- Begin Message --- Hi. mine stat doen't inclued more. sad. yutaka pi@raspberrypi:~ $ tc -s -d qdisc qdisc noqueue 0: dev lo root refcnt 2 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 qdisc cake 8017: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit diffserv3

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-21 Thread Pete Heist
> On Apr 19, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? I re-tested diffserv-llt quickly using the current head of cake and tc-adv and am confused by something:

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-20 Thread Dave Taht
kill it. On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > >> Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? The draft describing >> it seems to have expired ages ago: >> >>

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-20 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? The draft describing > it seems to have expired ages ago: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-tsvwg-latency-loss-tradeoff/ Also, adding to the diffserv thing, right now there seems to be

[Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

2018-04-19 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? The draft describing it seems to have expired ages ago: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-tsvwg-latency-loss-tradeoff/ -Toke ___ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net