Hello,
Thank you for your quick reply.
I take it that one of the DHCPs should read PPPoE?
Yes, you are quite correct. It should read: "TalkTalk uses DHCP to obtain
an IP address and not PPPoE as most other ISPs do." But I think you
understood that :)
My sync speeds on VDSL2 have been very
I'm back again, been quite busy so lost track of this. I'm using LEDE now
too.
Is there an easy way to see cake is actually working? A command or
something I can type in just to get clarification?
Also, I've set the overhead to 12 as recommended before, due to the VLAN BT
Openreach use in the
Thanks for all your replies again. They are most helpful.
>
>
In "Show Advanced Linklayer Options", there are other options too. Are
these best left alone? From the top, the numbers there are: 2047, 128, 0.
___
Cake mailing list
Here you go:
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/share/9eeb4cf725e2ad98373e7f31c94c84f4.html
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
be worse with just
standard cake?
Thanks so much for your help so far.
On 26 August 2016 at 12:52, Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenk...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> On 26/08/16 12:29, moeller0 wrote:
>
> Hi techicist,
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2016, at 13:15 , techic...@gmail.com wrote:
So best to just leave well alone I think :)
I do have one question. I sometimes use the thinkbroadband.com Ping Monitor
and it shows my ping as being 40-50ms a lot of the time, even with cake.
What's going on here?
___
Cake mailing list
be). Can anyone explain why
this might be? Am I doing something wrong?
I would appreciate an expert analysis of the graph, if possible :)
On 23 August 2016 at 21:09, Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hello techicist,
>
> On August 23, 2016 5:13:19 PM GMT+02:00, "
Many apologies, the link should be, http://imgur.com/6DrMJKI.
On 24 August 2016 at 18:01, techic...@gmail.com <techic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have today been using flent to do RRUL tests with the values set at 50%.
>
> I have uploaded the first test I have performed. It can be
My apologies again. The link should be, http://imgur.com/6DrMJKI
On 24 August 2016 at 18:03, techic...@gmail.com <techic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Many apologies, the link should be, http://imgur.com/6DrMJKI.
>
> On 24 August 2016 at 18:01, techic...@gmail.com <techic...@gmail.co
