Am 20.02.2013 um 07:02 schrieb gl...@twistedmatrix.com:
On Feb 19, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Axel Rau axel@chaos1.de wrote:
Hi,
the break came from finding and reading Unix Network Programming by
Stevens/Fenner/Rudoff. (-;
Am 14.02.2013 um 11:37 schrieb Fredrik Unger:
From the top
On Feb 20, 2013, at 1:51 AM, Axel Rau axel@chaos1.de wrote:
With my debug code, the master process dies immediately on connect to the web
server.
This does not happen, with the unmodified sendmsg.c.
Your patch appears to be backwards.
Your patch also appears to introduce its own
On Feb 19, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Axel Rau axel@chaos1.de wrote:
Hi,
the break came from finding and reading Unix Network Programming by
Stevens/Fenner/Rudoff. (-;
Am 14.02.2013 um 11:37 schrieb Fredrik Unger:
From the top of my head I find it strange that just 3 bytes was received.
Hi,
# ls -l /tmp/debug.dat.485*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Feb 13 23:07 /tmp/debug.dat.48563
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Feb 13 23:07 /tmp/debug.dat.48577
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Feb 13 23:07 /tmp/debug.dat.48578
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Feb 13 23:07 /tmp/debug.dat.48579
-rw-r--r--
On 02/14/2013 09:56 AM, Axel Rau wrote:
No, shutting down the server does not flush them.
I did not recognized in the 1st place that you have no close.
Closing them on function return and opening in append mode, in case file exist,
on next function entry might be the way to go.
I will try
Hi,
Am 14.02.2013 um 09:56 schrieb Axel Rau:
I will try fflush(3)...
A fflush(ddfp); before the return produced these results:
1. after startup:
---
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 64 Feb 14 10:33 debug.dat.63406
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel0 Feb 14 10:33 debug.dat.63431
-rw-r--r-- 1 root
Hi,
Am 14.02.2013 um 10:15 schrieb Fredrik Unger:
You should maybe also log the sending side, so you know if what is sent
with sendmsg is received.
I will try this next...
Axel
---
PGP-Key:29E99DD6 ☀ +49 151 2300 9283 ☀ computing @ chaos claudius
On 02/14/2013 11:37 AM, Fredrik Unger wrote:
2. After the error occured:
# cat /tmp/debug.dat.63431
recvmsg: fd [24] [0] result [3]
recvmsg: value:
d 0 0 0
---
Does this enlighten someone?
You could try something like :
Index: sendfd.py
Hi Fred,
thanks a lot for the debug patch.
It works with trial:
---
# trial test/test_sendmsg.py
twext.python.test.test_sendmsg
SendmsgTestCase
test_roundtrip ... [OK]
test_sendSubProcessFD ...
On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Fredrik Unger f...@tree.se wrote:
I found some problem with sendfd.c some time ago. [1]
For what it's worth, this issue was fixed a while ago. (Sorry for the slow
reply; was on vacation when this arrived.)
-g
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
