On Tue, Oct 04, 2016, Yoyo Zhou via Callers wrote:
>
> Try not to cancel the dance unless you all literally would rather go have
> some ice cream. Dancers don't go to a dance like this expecting the contra
> contra contra experience, but simply that you will lead them in dance and
> help them have
“Improper is tougher”
It certainly sounds like an opportunity for people to switch roles, and that
it’s tougher suggests it’d be a new experience. If they’ve never done that
before, even familiar and simple dances will seem new and newly challenging.
Read Weaver
Jamaica Plain, MA
Kliban via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:44:45 PM
To: callers@lists.sharedweight.net
Subject: Re: [Callers] Fewer than 6 dancers - Ideas?
On 10/4/2016 9:58 PM, Michael Barraclough via Callers wrote:
> I am sure that Kalia will kill me fo
On 10/4/2016 9:58 PM, Michael Barraclough via Callers wrote:
I am sure that Kalia will kill me for this (as I know she knows) but
the dance is really Pride of the Pingle by the late Ken Alexander (UK).
Someone from the USA saw it in the UK, misheard the name, assumed it
was Irish and called it
Scottish dances can also be a good source when you're short on numbers. And if
you have internet, you can look them up when you arrive at the venue, as the
abbreviated instructions for many of them can be found at
http://my.strathspey.org/dd/index/ (you can filter for set size using the menu:
On 2016-10-04 2158, Michael Barraclough via Callers wrote:
I am sure that Kalia will kill me for this (as I know she knows) but
the dance is really Pride of the Pingle by the late Ken Alexander (UK).
Someone from the USA saw it in the UK, misheard the name, assumed it
was Irish and called it
I am sure that Kalia will kill me for this (as I know she knows) but
the dance is really Pride of the Pingle by the late Ken Alexander (UK).
Someone from the USA saw it in the UK, misheard the name, assumed it
was Irish and called it Pride of the Dingle when they called it in the
USA. Such is the
Thanks to everyone for your great responses! I’ve taken notes, looked up
dances, watched videos, and will be ready (without panic) for the next dance
where we have very few dancers.
Kalia, I love Pride of Dingle and did call it that night as a 7-person dance. I
had Dingle skip the last
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } I have a few dances - I'm tight on time, will send soon. I want
more though so I hope others continue to share.
Laur
Sent
On 10/4/2016 2:37 PM, Winston, Alan P. via Callers wrote:
Its really tempting to cancel a contra if you only have a few people,
but you don't want to punish the people who showed up - they may
have foregone other options for their evenings. And there's a sense
of triumph if you can show them a
On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:18 PM, Yoyo Zhou via Callers
wrote:
> - Do 4-person dances and let the 5th person cut in wherever they please.
The notion of cutting in can also apply to other situations
where you have a fixed-size set or sets and an extra person
(or more
The Appalachian dance tradition has a bunch of two-couple
figures. See, for example,
http://www.bubbaguitar.com/squaredance/littletoc.html
http://round.soc.srcf.net/round/dances/krs/guts
Usually they'd usually be used in a context where pairs of
couples dance together and then one or
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Dale Wilson via Callers <
callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> We have something we call the "calling party progression" because we
> sometimes try out new dances with only four people present (or four + a
> caller).
>
> We form one set with "Up" being "North"
Jacqui --
I feel your pain. (I spent a couple of years trying to run an English Ceilidh
series - bouncy sweaty dances with swings - and while we once had 42 people we
more typically had 6 or fewer. I collected and made up a bunch of five person
dances, but most of them aren't very contra-y.
Jacqui,
I have called proper longways dances (without diagonals or out-of-minor-set
interactions) for two couples, switching active couples with every other
iteration but maintaining the same orientation in the room. Works well with
many English dances -- for example Softly Good Tummas -- because
Dale,
Thanks for answering my query. This sounds like a great idea!
Jacqui
> On Oct 4, 2016, at 12:19 PM, Dale Wilson wrote:
>
> We have something we call the "calling party progression" because we
> sometimes try out new dances with only four people present (or four
On 10/4/2016 12:09 PM, QuiAnn2 via Callers wrote:
I recently called at a contra dance where we had exactly 6 dancers for almost
the entire evening (one joined us later but only occasionally danced). This was
unexpected as they usually have attendance in the 12-20 range. I was able to
piece
I've had this dance for years to use when there are only 2 couples. Can't
remember which contra dance it comes from, but it's modified by adding a
square thru 5-hands (zesty) instead of 4-hands to take you back to your
partner for the Balance & Swing. It's fun and can be exhausting depending
on
We have something we call the "calling party progression" because we
sometimes try out new dances with only four people present (or four + a
caller).
We form one set with "Up" being "North" (for example). At the end of the
dance we progress by changing "Up" to be "East." and turning to face the
I recently called at a contra dance where we had exactly 6 dancers for almost
the entire evening (one joined us later but only occasionally danced). This was
unexpected as they usually have attendance in the 12-20 range. I was able to
piece together a night of mixers, triplets, and oddball
20 matches
Mail list logo