We've tried gyre and gimble a few times at a small local dance series. The
few who responded were positive. It has a certain je ne ces't quas (even
if we misrepresent the technical meaning of gimble :-)
Paul
That's what made me think of it. In some earlier message someone
mentioned "Gyre" (probably a diminutive of gyrate) as a possibility.
That led me to
"Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe"
"Gimble" may, or may not, be a real word spelled that way, but Gimbal
More candidates exist to replace "gypsy" than the Republicans have to succeed
the current U.S. president.Although both the current president and "gypsy" are
performing quite well, "gypsy" is not constrained by term limits Michael
Fuerst 802 N Broadway Urbana IL 61801 217 239
You all are tickling me every which way today! Mome raths and slithy toves,
raths and toves. :D which is which?
Andrea
Sent from my iOnlypretendtomultitask
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 12:49 PM, David Chandler wrote:
>
> Jabberwocky, as in:
> ’Twas brillig, and the slithy
Jabberwocky, as in:
’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe
I'm not sure dancers will appreciate being called "slithy toves," though we
have been looking for new terms to use to describe dancers in different
positions. Perhaps the other position could be "mome
I love this! And it has a playful kind of sound, despite its technical origin.
:-) reminds me of jabberwocky somehow...
Andrea
Sent from my iOnlypretendtomultitask
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Sivier via Callers
> wrote:
>
> I've been thinking
I've been thinking about this as well. I'd like to propose "Gimbal"
as a substitute for gypsy. You could even spell it "Gymbal" if you
liked. ;-) This also has the same number of syllables and starts with
the same letter as a bonus. A gimbal is a pivoted support that allows
the
Dear callers seeking alternatives to "gypsy":
My sister, Laura, suggested "compass" as an alternate term. I haven't used
it yet, but I think it could work well:
1. It has the same number of syllables as the word it's replacing,
plus distinct consonant sounds.
2. It's recognizable.
3. It makes
Neal, I disagree with what you've said. As Read's reply and Jeff's post
point out, actually, contra dances might not be considered dance
choreography under the statute. And, if I were a judge looking at it, I'd
say it isn't. Contra dances might have one or two unique moves, but that
is much,
Here's a post I wrote a couple years ago summarizing what I found when I
looked into this: http://www.jefftk.com/p/can-you-copyright-a-contra-dance
On Jan 25, 2016 8:22 AM, "Read Weaver via Callers" <
callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Well, maybe. But:
>
> "Congress has stated that the
Well, maybe. But:
"Congress has stated that the subject matter of choreography does not include
‘‘social dance steps and simple routines.’’ H.R. Rep. 94–1476 at 54 (1976). A
compilation of simple routines, social dances, or even exercises would not be
registrable unless it results in a
11 matches
Mail list logo